Tecno Spark 50s
Tecno
PKR 80,999
57/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50s vs vivo X200
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 18 Oct 2026.
The short answer
The vivo X200 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 86 against 57 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 50s still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50s is the cheaper of the two at PKR 80,999 against PKR 214,999.
vivo X200
Vivo
PKR 214,999
86/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo X200 takes it by 29.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50s costs PKR 134,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50s packs a 700 mAh larger battery.
- vivo X200 charges 45W faster.
- vivo X200 offers 8 GB more RAM.
- vivo X200 ships with 896 GB more storage.
- vivo X200 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50s if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the vivo X200 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50s | vivo X200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 80,999 Cheaper | PKR 214,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 16, 2026 (announced); expected release date: October 20, 2026 | October 2024 (China), Global rollout started later in 2024 |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.2 mm | 160.3 × 74.8 × 8.0 mm (varies slightly by color) |
| Weight | 210 g | Approx. 197–202 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 (dust-tight and protected against water splashes). | IP68 Dust & Water Resistant IP69 High-pressure Water Resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1576 pixels | 1260 × 2800 pixels (1.5K) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120Hz refresh rate, approximately 256 ppi, 560 nits brightness. | LTPO AMOLED 120Hz Adaptive HDR10+ |
| Protection | Not specified. | Schott Xensation Alpha Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × 2.5GHz Cortex-A76 + 6 × 2.0GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HIOS 16 | Android 15 with OriginOS 5 (China) / Funtouch OS 15 (Global) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB UFS 2.2 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot). | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, wide-angle, autofocus, LED flash. | 50 MP Wide (OIS) 50 MP Periscope Telephoto (3x Optical Zoom, OIS) 50 MP Ultra-Wide ZEISS Optics Laser Autofocus HDR Panorama LED Flash Super Night Mode Portrait Mode Macro Photography |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP, f/2.0, wide-angle. | 32 MP Autofocus HDR Better |
| Video recording | Rear: 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps. Front: 720p video recording. | 8K 4K at up to 60fps 1080p Slow Motion Gyro-EIS OIS |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po (non-removable). 6500 mAh Better | Silicon-Carbon Li-Ion (Non-removable) 5800mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W wired charging, bypass charging. | 90W FlashCharge Reverse Wired Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (market dependent) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 7, Dual-Band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity sensor, compass. | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C. | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50s or vivo X200?
vivo X200 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 29.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark 50s can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50s and vivo X200 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50s is listed at PKR 80,999 and vivo X200 at PKR 214,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50s cheaper by PKR 134,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50s or vivo X200?
vivo X200 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50s or vivo X200?
vivo X200 leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50s carries a 6500 mAh cell and vivo X200 a 5800 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50s or vivo X200?
vivo X200 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50s runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6 nm) while vivo X200 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50s vs Oppo A7 Pro
vivo X200 vs Oppo A7 Pro
Tecno Spark 50s vs Xiaomi Poco X8
vivo X200 vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Tecno Spark 50s vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
vivo X200 vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Tecno Spark 50s vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
vivo X200 vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.