Tecno Spark Go 2024
Tecno
PKR 25,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Xiaomi Poco F6
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 7 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F6 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 84 against 60 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark Go 2024 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark Go 2024 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 25,999 against PKR 124,999.
Xiaomi Poco F6
Poco
PKR 124,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F6 takes it by 24.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark Go 2024 costs PKR 99,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 charges 80W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 ships with 384 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 has a 37 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Poco F6 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark Go 2024 if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F6 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark Go 2024 | Xiaomi Poco F6 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 25,999 Cheaper | PKR 124,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | November 2023 | 23 May 2024 |
| Dimensions | 163.7 × 75.6 × 8.6 mm | 160.5 × 74.4 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 179 g Better |
| Water resistance | Not officially certified | IP64 dust and splash resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.67 Inches Better |
| Resolution | 720 × 1612 pixels (HD+) | 1220 x 2712 Pixels (~446 PPI) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 90Hz Dynamic Port, Eye Care Mode, 90Hz Smooth Refresh Rate | AMOLED, 68 Billion Colors, 120Hz Refresh Rate HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 2400 nits Peak Brightness, 2160Hz Instant Touch Sampling Rate |
| Protection | Basic scratch-resistant glass (manufacturer has not confirmed Gorilla Glass or any other branded protection). | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A75 @ 1.6 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 1.6 GHz | Octa-core (1× Cortex-X4 3.0GHz, 4× Cortex-A720 2.8GHz, 3× Cortex-A520 2.0GHz) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 735 |
| Operating system | Android 13 (Go Edition) with HIOS 13 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB LPDDR4X | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 64GB / 128GB eMMC 5.1 | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.0 Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (Dedicated Slot) | No microSD support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP, f/1.9, Auto Focus (AF) 0.08 MP AI Lens Dual-LED Flash, HDR, Panorama, AI Scene Detection | 50MP Sony IMX882 (OIS) 8MP Ultra-Wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Dual-LED Flash, AI Beauty, HDR | 20MP Selfie Camera Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 4K video recording at 60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Li-Po (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W wired charging | 90W Wired Turbo Charging 100% Charge in approximately 35 minutes USB Type-C Charging Port Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.0 | v5.4 with A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Software Gyroscope | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor X-axis Linear Motor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark Go 2024 or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 24.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Spark Go 2024 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark Go 2024 and Xiaomi Poco F6 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark Go 2024 is listed at PKR 25,999 and Xiaomi Poco F6 at PKR 124,999. That makes Tecno Spark Go 2024 cheaper by PKR 99,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark Go 2024 or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark Go 2024 uses a 13 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Poco F6, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark Go 2024 or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 leads on battery. Tecno Spark Go 2024 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F6 a 5000 mAh cell, with 10W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark Go 2024 or Xiaomi Poco F6?
Xiaomi Poco F6 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark Go 2024 runs the Unisoc T606 (12nm) while Xiaomi Poco F6 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Tecno Spark 20C
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 20C
Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Tecno Spark 20P
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 20P
Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Tecno Spark 20
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 20
Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Tecno Spark 30C
Xiaomi Poco F6 vs Tecno Spark 30C
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.