vivo iQOO 13
iQOO
PKR 189,999
98/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
vivo iQOO 13 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 17 Jun 2026.
The short answer
The vivo iQOO 13 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 98 against 94 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and value for money. The ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra still wins on camera, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The vivo iQOO 13 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 189,999 against PKR 249,999.
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Nubia
PKR 249,999
94/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo iQOO 13 takes it by 4.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- vivo iQOO 13 costs PKR 60,000 less.
- ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra packs a 950 mAh larger battery.
- vivo iQOO 13 charges 30W faster.
- ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the vivo iQOO 13 if…
you care most about performance, battery & charging and value for money.
Buy the ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra if…
you care most about camera.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | vivo iQOO 13 | ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 189,999 Cheaper | PKR 249,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | November 2024 | September 16, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 163.4 × 76.7 × 8.0 mm | 162.1 × 75.7 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 207 g Better | 208 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance | IP68/IP69-rated protection. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.82 Inches Better | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 × 3168 Pixels (QHD+) Better | 1260 × 2800 pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B Colors, 144Hz | LTPO OLED 144Hz 10-bit, 1 billion colors Up to 4,500 nits |
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha Glass | Not reliably specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core 2 × Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.32 GHz 6 × Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53 GHz | Octa-core Qualcomm Oryon, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 15, Funtouch OS 15 (Global) / OriginOS 5 (China) | Android 16 Nebula AIOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 | 512GB / 1TB |
| Card slot | No microSD support | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.9, Wide (Main), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, Telephoto, 2x Optical Zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, Ultra-Wide Zeiss Optics HDR Panorama Laser Autofocus OIS LED Flash | 200MP + 50MP Ultra-wide + 64MP Periscope Telephoto, OIS Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP, f/2.5, Wide | 32MP OIS, autofocus, LED flash, HDR, panorama, AI Image Master |
| Video recording | 8K @ 30fps 4K @ 30/60fps 1080p @ 30/60fps Gyro-EIS OIS | 4K video recording, OIS, EIS, AI video processing. |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion 6150 mAh | Li-Po / Silicon-Carbon 7100 mAh, non-removable Better |
| Wired charging | 120W FlashCharge wired charging and reverse wired charging support. Better | 90W wired, 50W wireless, reverse wireless charging, reverse wired charging. |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7 Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 7, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be, tri-band (2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz), 2×2 MIMO. |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 A2DP LE aptX HD aptX Adaptive | Bluetooth 6.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-Display Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Color Spectrum Sensor | Fingerprint (ultrasonic, under-display), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass, ambient light sensor, infrared sensor. |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 OTG Support | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, vivo iQOO 13 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
vivo iQOO 13 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.3 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging and value for money. ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of vivo iQOO 13 and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra in Pakistan?
vivo iQOO 13 is listed at PKR 189,999 and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra at PKR 249,999. That makes vivo iQOO 13 cheaper by PKR 60,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, vivo iQOO 13 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. vivo iQOO 13 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, vivo iQOO 13 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
vivo iQOO 13 leads on battery. vivo iQOO 13 carries a 6150 mAh cell and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra a 7100 mAh cell, with 120W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, vivo iQOO 13 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
vivo iQOO 13 is the stronger gaming phone here. vivo iQOO 13 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) while ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
vivo iQOO 13 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
vivo iQOO 13 vs Oppo Reno 16
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
vivo iQOO 13 vs vivo V80 Lite
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs vivo V80 Lite
vivo iQOO 13 vs Honor X9e Pro
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.