vivo X100 Ultra
Vivo
PKR 309,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
vivo X100 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 8 Jul 2026.
The short answer
The vivo X100 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 88 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and memory & storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is the cheaper of the two at PKR 174,999 against PKR 309,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Redmi
PKR 174,999
88/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo X100 Ultra takes it by 3.9 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max costs PKR 135,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max packs a 3,710 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max charges 20W faster.
- vivo X100 Ultra offers 4 GB more RAM.
- vivo X100 Ultra ships with 512 GB more storage.
- vivo X100 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the vivo X100 Ultra if…
you care most about performance and memory & storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | vivo X100 Ultra | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 309,999 | PKR 174,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | May 13, 2024 | Expected in 2026 |
| Dimensions | 164.1 × 75.6 × 9.2 mm | 163.4 × 78.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 229 g Better | Approximately 229.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 dust and water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes) | IP68-rated protection; exact Xiaomi test conditions to be confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1440 × 3200 pixels (QHD+) Better | 1280 × 2772 pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | AMOLED |
| Protection | Armor Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported |
| CPU | Octa-core 1× Cortex-X4 (3.3 GHz) 5× Cortex-A720 2× Cortex-A520 | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali GPU |
| Operating system | Android 14 OriginOS 4 | Android 16 HyperOS 3 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 Better | 256GB / 512GB UFS |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP wide (Sony LYT-900, 1-inch sensor, OIS) 200MP periscope telephoto (Samsung HP9, OIS, 3.7× optical zoom) 50MP ultrawide with autofocus ZEISS T* lens coating Laser autofocus Gimbal stabilization HDR Panorama LED flash Better | 50MP + 8MP — reported OIS, PDAF, HDR, Panorama, LED Flash |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP, Autofocus Better | 32MP |
| Video recording | 8K 4K up to 120fps 1080p slow motion HDR and Dolby Vision recording Gyro-EIS and OIS | Up to 4K — reported |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500mAh Silicon-Carbon battery | Si/C Li-Ion (Silicon-Carbon) Battery 9210 mAh Non-removable Better |
| Wired charging | 80W wired FlashCharge 30W wireless charging Reverse wired charging Reverse wireless charging. | 100W wired fast charging Reverse Charging 22.5W wired Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Ambient light sensor Compass Color spectrum sensor. | Fingerprint Sensor Under-display Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, vivo X100 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
vivo X100 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.9 points. It wins on performance and memory & storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of vivo X100 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max in Pakistan?
vivo X100 Ultra is listed at PKR 309,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max at PKR 174,999. That makes Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max cheaper by PKR 135,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, vivo X100 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max leads on battery. vivo X100 Ultra carries a 5500 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max a 9210 mAh cell, with 80W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, vivo X100 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
vivo X100 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. vivo X100 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
vivo X100 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 11 Pro
vivo X100 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
vivo X100 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
vivo X100 Ultra vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei nova 16 SE
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.