Head to head

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max

Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Jul 2026.

The short answer

The Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 97 against 88 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is the cheaper of the two at PKR 174,999 against PKR 253,999.

View raw data
Add another phone to this comparison

Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.

The verdict

Spec-derived

Vivo X300 Ultra takes it by 9.1 points on our weighted spec score.

Performance Vivo X300 Ultra leads

Gaming score where available, otherwise chipset tier plus usable RAM.

Camera Level

Camera Score where available, otherwise sensor resolution and lens count. Megapixels alone do not measure image quality.

Battery & charging Vivo X300 Ultra leads

Cell capacity in mAh weighted with rated wired charging output.

Display Level

Pixel density, refresh rate and panel technology.

Memory & storage Vivo X300 Ultra leads

Highest advertised RAM and internal storage configuration.

Value for money Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max leads

Combined spec score divided by current Pakistani retail price.

What actually differs

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max costs PKR 79,000 less.
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max packs a 2,700 mAh larger battery.
  • Vivo X300 Ultra charges 20W faster.
  • Vivo X300 Ultra offers 4 GB more RAM.
  • Vivo X300 Ultra ships with 512 GB more storage.
  • Vivo X300 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.

Buy the Vivo X300 Ultra if…

you care most about performance, battery & charging and memory & storage.

Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max if…

you care most about value for money.

Full specification comparison

Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Price in Pakistan
Retail price PKR 253,999 PKR 174,999 Cheaper
Design & build
Release date April 30, 2026 (expected in Pakistan) Expected in 2026
Dimensions 164.3 × 76.4 × 8.5 mm 163.4 × 78.3 × 8.6 mm
Weight 228 g Better Approximately 229.5 g
Water resistance IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance. IP68-rated protection; exact Xiaomi test conditions to be confirmed
Display
Screen size 6.8 inches 6.83 inches Better
Resolution 1260 × 2800 pixels (~452 ppi) 1280 × 2772 pixels Better
Panel type LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ AMOLED
Protection Not officially specified Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Performance
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported
CPU Octa-core (up to 4.6 GHz) Octa-core
GPU Adreno 840 Mali GPU
Operating system Android 16 Android 16 HyperOS 3
Memory & storage
RAM 12 GB / 16 GB Better 8GB / 12GB
Internal storage 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB (UFS 4.1) Better 256GB / 512GB UFS
Card slot No Dedicated microSDXC Slot
Camera
Main camera 200 MP (wide, OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (OIS, 3× optical zoom) + 50 MP ultra-wide Better 50MP + 8MP — reported OIS, PDAF, HDR, Panorama, LED Flash
Selfie camera 50 MP wide Better 32MP
Video recording 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS Up to 4K — reported
Battery & charging
Battery capacity Non-removable Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Si-C battery) Si/C Li-Ion (Silicon-Carbon) Battery 9210 mAh Non-removable Better
Wired charging 120W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse charging Better 100W wired fast charging Reverse Charging 22.5W wired
Connectivity & extras
SIM Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant) Dual Nano-SIM
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
NFC Yes Yes
Sensors Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass Fingerprint Sensor Under-display Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor
USB USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C OTG

“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?

Vivo X300 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 9.1 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.

What is the price of Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max in Pakistan?

Vivo X300 Ultra is listed at PKR 253,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max at PKR 174,999. That makes Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max cheaper by PKR 79,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.

Which phone has the better battery, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?

Vivo X300 Ultra leads on battery. Vivo X300 Ultra carries a 6510 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max a 9210 mAh cell, with 120W and 100W wired charging respectively.

Which is better for gaming, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?

Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo X300 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported.

Related comparisons

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2 Vivo X300 Ultra vs Huawei nova 16 SE Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei nova 16 SE Vivo X300 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G Vivo X300 Ultra vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max

Tools that use this data

Camera Score Tool Battery Score Tool Gaming Performance Checker AI Mobile Recommendation Tool All comparisons

Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.