Vivo Y16
Vivo
PKR 39,999
63/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 7 Jan 2026.
The Vivo Y16 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 63 against 46 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and value for money. The ZTE nubia A57 still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE nubia A57 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 36,499 against PKR 39,999.
Vivo
PKR 39,999
63/100 overall
Full specs & reviewNubia
PKR 36,499
46/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Vivo Y16 takes it by 17.3 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance, camera and value for money.
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
| Specification | Vivo Y16 | ZTE nubia A57 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 39,999 | PKR 36,499 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2022 (Pakistan) | July 30, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 164 × 75.6 × 8.2 mm | 160.1 × 70.4 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 184 g Better | 193 g |
| Water resistance | No official IP rating | IP64 — dust-tight and protected against water splashes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.51 inches | 6.75-inch Better |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (~270 ppi) Better | 720 × 1570 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | No official protection | Unspecified. |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4×2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Operating system | Android 12, Funtouch OS 12 | Android 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4GB |
| Internal storage | 64 GB | 64GB/128GB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP (wide) + 2 MP (macro) | 13 MP, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps (rear), 1080p@30fps (front) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W wired | 22.5W wired fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Vivo Y16 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 17.3 points. It wins on performance, camera and value for money. ZTE nubia A57 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Vivo Y16 is listed at PKR 39,999 and ZTE nubia A57 at PKR 36,499. That makes ZTE nubia A57 cheaper by PKR 3,500. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Vivo Y16 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
ZTE nubia A57 leads on battery. Vivo Y16 carries a 5000 mAh cell and ZTE nubia A57 a 5000 mAh cell, with 10W and 22W wired charging respectively.
Vivo Y16 is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo Y16 runs the MediaTek Helio P35 (12 nm) while ZTE nubia A57 runs the Unisoc T7250 (12 nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.