vivo Y400 Pro
Vivo
PKR 89,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
vivo Y400 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 19 Jul 2026.
The short answer
The vivo Y400 Pro and the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. vivo Y400 Pro leads on performance. The vivo Y400 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 89,999 against PKR 289,999.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Poco
PKR 289,999
85/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedToo close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
What actually differs
- vivo Y400 Pro costs PKR 200,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra packs a 2,550 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra charges 10W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if…
you care most about performance and value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | vivo Y400 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 89,999 Cheaper | PKR 289,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | June 2025 | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 163.7 × 75.0 × 7.5 mm (Nebula Purple) / 7.7 mm (Fest Gold/Freestyle White) | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm |
| Weight | 182 g Better | 235 g |
| Water resistance | IP65 (Dust-tight and resistant to water jets) | IP68 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.77 inches | 6.9-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2392 pixels (FHD+) | 1200 × 2608 pixels Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120 Hz | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz Quad-core Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP, f/1.79, PDAF 2 MP Depth Sensor LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode |
| Video recording | Up to 4K | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 5500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 90W FlashCharge | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 A2DP LE | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Supported | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, vivo Y400 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
vivo Y400 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
What is the price of vivo Y400 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra in Pakistan?
vivo Y400 Pro is listed at PKR 89,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra at PKR 289,999. That makes vivo Y400 Pro cheaper by PKR 200,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, vivo Y400 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. vivo Y400 Pro uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, vivo Y400 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra leads on battery. vivo Y400 Pro carries a 5500 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra a 8050 mAh cell, with 90W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, vivo Y400 Pro or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
vivo Y400 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. vivo Y400 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
vivo Y400 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Infinix Note 50 Pro Racing Edition
vivo Y400 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Infinix Note 40 Pro 5G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Infinix Note 60 Edge 5G
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Infinix Note 60 Edge 5G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Oppo A7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Oppo A7 Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.