Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro
Civi
PKR 145,999
87/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs ZTE nubia A57
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 1 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 87 against 48 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The ZTE nubia A57 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE nubia A57 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 36,499 against PKR 145,999.
ZTE nubia A57
Nubia
PKR 36,499
48/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Civi 5 Pro takes it by 39.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- ZTE nubia A57 costs PKR 109,500 less.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro charges 44.5W faster.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro offers 12 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro ships with 384 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro has a 37 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Buy the ZTE nubia A57 if…
you care most about value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro | ZTE nubia A57 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 145,999 | PKR 36,499 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | May 22, 2025 | July 30, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 157.05 × 73.2 × 7.65 mm | 160.1 × 70.4 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 181 g Better | 193 g |
| Water resistance | No Official IP Rating | IP64 — dust-tight and protected against water splashes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.55 inches | 6.75-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1236 × 2750 pixels (1.5K) Better | 720 × 1570 pixels |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 68 Billion Colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid 120Hz Adaptive | IPS LCD, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Unspecified. |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) | Unisoc T7250 (12 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 1× Cortex-X4 @ 3.21 GHz 3× Cortex-A720 @ 3.0 GHz 2× Cortex-A720 @ 2.8 GHz 2× Cortex-A720 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Operating system | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better | 4GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 4.0 Better | 64GB/128GB |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP Leica Wide Camera (OIS) 50MP Leica Telephoto Camera 12MP Ultra-Wide Camera Leica color tuning 4K video recording HDR Panorama Night Mode Better | 13 MP, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Selfie Camera Autofocus HDR Better | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video recording | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p OIS + EIS (Rear), EIS (Front) | 1080p@30fps (rear), 1080p@30fps (front) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6000mAh Silicon-Carbon Battery Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 67W Wired Fast Charging Better | 22.5W wired fast charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (DSDS) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be), Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 with A2DP, LE, LHDC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Optical In-display Fingerprint Sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor Barometer Snapdragon Elite Gaming Adreno Frame Motion Engine Game Turbo Liquid Cooling System AI Performance Optimization | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 39.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. ZTE nubia A57 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro and ZTE nubia A57 in Pakistan?
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro is listed at PKR 145,999 and ZTE nubia A57 at PKR 36,499. That makes ZTE nubia A57 cheaper by PKR 109,500. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro uses a 50 MP main sensor against 13 MP on ZTE nubia A57, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro leads on battery. Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro carries a 6000 mAh cell and ZTE nubia A57 a 5000 mAh cell, with 67W and 22W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) while ZTE nubia A57 runs the Unisoc T7250 (12 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs vivo V80 Lite
ZTE nubia A57 vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs Tecno Camon Air
ZTE nubia A57 vs Tecno Camon Air
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
ZTE nubia A57 vs TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition
Xiaomi Civi 5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Power
ZTE nubia A57 vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Power
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.