ZTE Blade V80 Pro
ZTE Mobile
PKR 48,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 26 Feb 2026.
The ZTE Nubia A36 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 68 against 60 on our combined specification score. It leads on value for money. The ZTE Blade V80 Pro still wins on camera and battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE Nubia A36 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 19,999 against PKR 48,999.
ZTE Mobile
PKR 48,999
60/100 overall
Full specs & reviewZTE Mobile
PKR 19,999
68/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
ZTE Nubia A36 takes it by 8.1 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
| Specification | ZTE Blade V80 Pro | ZTE Nubia A36 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 48,999 | PKR 19,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | December 2025 | 2024 (Pakistan availability varies) |
| Dimensions | 166 × 79 × 7.7 mm | 163.6 × 75.0 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | ≈195 g |
| Water resistance | IP64 dust tight and splash resistant | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.75 inches Better | 6.6 inches |
| Resolution | 900 × 1940 pixels (~317 ppi) Better | 720 × 1612 pixels (~267 ppi) |
| Panel type | IPS LCD 120 Hz ~1000 nits peak (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Protection | Not listed | Scratch-resistant glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7280 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4×1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 + 4×1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 13 (Go Edition) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB Better | 4 GB |
| Internal storage | 256 GB Better | 64 GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP (wide) PDAF, LED flash, HDR, panorama Better | 13 MP wide |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP Better | 5 MP |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 22.5W wired + 10W reverse wired charging Better | 10W wired |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes (market dependent) | No |
| Sensors | Fingerprint Sensor: Side-mounted Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 with OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
ZTE Nubia A36 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 8.1 points. It wins on value for money. ZTE Blade V80 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
ZTE Blade V80 Pro is listed at PKR 48,999 and ZTE Nubia A36 at PKR 19,999. That makes ZTE Nubia A36 cheaper by PKR 29,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
ZTE Blade V80 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. ZTE Blade V80 Pro uses a 108 MP main sensor against 13 MP on ZTE Nubia A36, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
ZTE Blade V80 Pro leads on battery. ZTE Blade V80 Pro carries a 5000 mAh cell and ZTE Nubia A36 a 5000 mAh cell, with 22W and 10W wired charging respectively.
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.