Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro
Asus
PKR 347,499
89/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 11 Jan 2026.
The short answer
The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 89 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 347,499.
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedAsus ROG Phone 9 Pro takes it by 10.5 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 272,500 less.
- Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro packs a 800 mAh larger battery.
- Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro charges 32W faster.
- Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro offers 16 GB more RAM.
- Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 347,499 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | November 19, 2024 | June 2022 |
| Dimensions | 163.8 × 76.8 × 8.9 mm | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 227 g | 204.5 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 in | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~386 ppi) | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, HDR10+, up to 185Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.2 GHz + 3×2.8 GHz + 4×2.0 GHz) | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB / 24 GB Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 512 GB / 1 TB UFS 4.0 Better | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP wide + 13 MP ultra-wide + 32 MP telephoto (3× optical zoom, OIS) | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP wide Better | 16MP HDR, Dual Video |
| Video recording | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 5800 mAh Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 65W wired, (wireless not officially supported) Better | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68 dust/water resistant) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG support | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 10.5 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G in Pakistan?
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro is listed at PKR 347,499 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G at PKR 74,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 272,500. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro leads on battery. Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro carries a 5800 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 65W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.