Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Google Pixel
PKR 298,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 18 Feb 2026.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 84 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 298,999.
Google Pixel
PKR 298,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewOppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL takes it by 4.4 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance, camera and memory & storage.
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro XL | Oppo Reno 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 298,999 | PKR 199,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | August 28, 2025 (official global launch) | July 2, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 182 g / 193 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 dust/water resistant | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches Better | 6.32-inch |
| Resolution | 2992 x 1344 pixels (QHD+) Better | 2640 x 1216 Pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO OLED, 1-120Hz, HDR Up to 3300 nits | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G5 (3nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz |
| GPU | Mali GPU (latest generation) | Adreno 722 |
| Operating system | Android 16 (ships with; up to 7 years of updates) | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB Better | 12GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256/512/1 TB Better | 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | No card slot | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP Wide (main): ƒ/1.68, 82° FoV, 1/1.31″ sensor, OIS 48 MP Ultrawide: ƒ/1.7, 123° FoV, autofocus 48 MP Telephoto: ƒ/2.8, 5× Optical Zoom, OIS | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus |
| Selfie camera | 42 MP Dual-PD AF Selfie: ƒ/2.2, wide FoV, autofocus | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better |
| Video recording | Up to 4K @ 60fps, 8K @ 30fps | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion 5200 mAh (non-removable) | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better |
| Wired charging | Fast charging (~45W USB-C Power Delivery) Wireless Charging: Yes (Qi2 / magnetic support) | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM (Dual SIM, region dependent) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be), Dual-band | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display Fingerprint Sensor (Ultrasonic) Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer etc. | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.4 points. It wins on performance, camera and memory & storage. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is listed at PKR 298,999 and Oppo Reno 16 at PKR 199,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 99,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL carries a 5200 mAh cell and Oppo Reno 16 a 6490 mAh cell, with 45W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is the stronger gaming phone here. Google Pixel 10 Pro XL runs the Google Tensor G5 (3nm) while Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.