Infinix Note 40 5G
Infinix
PKR 64,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Infinix Note 40 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 3 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Infinix Note 40 5G and the Vivo X300 Pro finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance. The Infinix Note 40 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 339,999.
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo
PKR 339,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedToo close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
What actually differs
- Infinix Note 40 5G costs PKR 275,000 less.
- Vivo X300 Pro packs a 1,510 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo X300 Pro charges 57W faster.
- Vivo X300 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo X300 Pro ships with 512 GB more storage.
- Vivo X300 Pro has a 92 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Infinix Note 40 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Infinix Note 40 5G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 339,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | May 2024 | Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 165.51 × 75.93 × 7.91 mm | 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 185 g Better | 226 g |
| Water resistance | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels. | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B Colors, Multitouch 120Hz refresh rate, 1300 nits peak brightness, 10-bit color, | 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass. | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2 × 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Arm G1-Ultra |
| Operating system | Android 14, XOS 14 | Android 16 with OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP, f/1.75, OIS + 2 MP + 2 MP, Quad-LED Flash, HDR, Panorama | 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP, f/2.2, Dual-LED Flash | 50 MP wide (AF) Better |
| Video recording | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, gyro-EIS, HDR, Dual Video. | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) Better |
| Wired charging | 33W wired, 15W wireless, reverse wired charging, reverse wireless charging | 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Ambient Light | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Infinix Note 40 5G or Vivo X300 Pro?
Infinix Note 40 5G and Vivo X300 Pro finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
What is the price of Infinix Note 40 5G and Vivo X300 Pro in Pakistan?
Infinix Note 40 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 339,999. That makes Infinix Note 40 5G cheaper by PKR 275,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Infinix Note 40 5G or Vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo X300 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Infinix Note 40 5G uses a 108 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Vivo X300 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Infinix Note 40 5G or Vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo X300 Pro leads on battery. Infinix Note 40 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Pro a 6510 mAh cell, with 33W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Infinix Note 40 5G or Vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Infinix Note 40 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) while Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Infinix Note 40 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Infinix Note 40 5G vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Vivo X300 Pro vs Infinix Note 50 Racing Edition
Infinix Note 40 5G vs Oppo A7 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro vs Oppo A7 Pro
Infinix Note 40 5G vs Infinix Note 12 (2023)
Vivo X300 Pro vs Infinix Note 12 (2023)
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.