Motorola Razr 50
Motorola
PKR 229,999
84/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Motorola Razr 50 vs Oppo Reno 16
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 24 Jan 2026.
The short answer
The Motorola Razr 50 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 84 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 229,999.
Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedMotorola Razr 50 takes it by 4.7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Oppo Reno 16 costs PKR 30,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 2,290 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 charges 47W faster.
- Motorola Razr 50 ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Motorola Razr 50 if…
you care most about performance, camera and memory & storage.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Oppo Reno 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 229,999 | PKR 199,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2024 (Expected / Available in Pakistan via import) | July 2, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 171.3 × 74 × 7.3 mm (folded 88.1 × 74 × 15.9 mm) | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 182 g / 193 g Better |
| Water resistance | IPX8 (water resistant) | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9 inches Better | 6.32-inch |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2640 pixels (~413 ppi) | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, HDR10+, 120Hz | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 722 |
| Operating system | Android 14 ( Up to Android 17 (3 major updates) | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB / 12 GB | 12GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256 GB / 512 GB Better | 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (wide), f/1.7, OIS 13 MP (ultra-wide), 120° | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP (wide) | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better |
| Video recording | 4K@30fps 1080p@30/60fps HDR video supported | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Po 4200 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 33W wired fast charging 15W wireless charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM + eSIM) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted fingerprint Accelerometer Gyro Proximity Compass | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Motorola Razr 50 or Oppo Reno 16?
Motorola Razr 50 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.7 points. It wins on performance, camera and memory & storage. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Motorola Razr 50 and Oppo Reno 16 in Pakistan?
Motorola Razr 50 is listed at PKR 229,999 and Oppo Reno 16 at PKR 199,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 30,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Motorola Razr 50 or Oppo Reno 16?
Motorola Razr 50 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Motorola Razr 50 or Oppo Reno 16?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Motorola Razr 50 carries a 4200 mAh cell and Oppo Reno 16 a 6490 mAh cell, with 33W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Motorola Razr 50 or Oppo Reno 16?
Motorola Razr 50 is the stronger gaming phone here. Motorola Razr 50 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) while Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Motorola Razr 50 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.