Oppo Reno 16 Pro
Oppo
PKR 239,999
91/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 May 2026.
The short answer
The Oppo Reno 16 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 91 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and display. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 239,999.
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno
PKR 74,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedOppo Reno 16 Pro takes it by 12.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G costs PKR 165,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro packs a 1,500 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro charges 47W faster.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro has a 136 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Oppo Reno 16 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 Pro if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G if…
you care most about value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 Pro | Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 239,999 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July - August 2026 (Global). | June 2022 |
| Dimensions | Not listed | 166.7 × 74.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | Around 190–200g (expected) Better | 204.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 / IP69 | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.8 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1264 × 2780 pixels Better | 1080 × 2460 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | IPS LCD, 120Hz Refresh Rate Up to 500 nits (typical) |
| Protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (rumored) | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 / 9400+ (rumored) | MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16 ( ColorOS 16) | Android 12 HIOS 8.6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB /16GB Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256GB 512GB 1TB Better | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | No microSD card support |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200MP wide, OIS 50MP periscope telephoto, OIS 50MP ultrawide Better | 64MP (Wide, f/1.6, PDAF, OIS, RGBW sensor) 2MP Macro 2MP Depth Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama OIS + EIS Video Stabilization Night Portrait |
| Selfie camera | 50MP front camera Better | 16MP HDR, Dual Video |
| Video recording | 4K@30/60fps 8K recording expected | 1080p@30fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Silicon-Carbon Li-Ion Non-removable 6500mAh – 7000mAh expected Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W wired fast charging 50W wireless charging expected Reverse charging supported Better | 33W Flash Charge USB Type-C Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 / Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint sensor Face Unlock AI features Circle to Search expected Ultra stabilization Satellite communication rumored | Side-mounted Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Oppo Reno 16 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.3 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 Pro and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 Pro is listed at PKR 239,999 and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G at PKR 74,999. That makes Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G cheaper by PKR 165,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Oppo Reno 16 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 Pro uses a 200 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 Pro or Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G?
Oppo Reno 16 Pro leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 Pro carries a 6500 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Oppo Reno 16 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.