Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 82 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and value for money. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Samsung Galaxy S22+ is the cheaper of the two at PKR 151,999 against PKR 199,999.
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewSamsung
PKR 151,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ takes it by 5.5 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
you care most about performance, camera and value for money.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Samsung Galaxy S22+ |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 151,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | February 2022 |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 157.4 × 75.8 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 195 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 – Dust-tight and water-resistant for up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.6 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 1080 × 2340 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | Dynamic AMOLED 2X 120Hz (Adaptive) HDR10+ |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) / Exynos 2200 (4nm) in selected regions |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 730 / Xclipse 920 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 12 (Upgradable to newer Android versions with One UI) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X Better | 8GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP (Wide, OIS) 10 MP (Telephoto, 3x Optical Zoom, OIS) 12 MP (Ultra-wide) LED Flash, Auto HDR, Panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 10 MP |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | Up to 8K@24fps, 4K@60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Li-Po (non-removable) 4500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better | 45W wired fast charging, 15W wireless charging, and 4.5W reverse wireless charging (Wireless PowerShare). |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Single Nano-SIM or Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (market dependent) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 6/6E (region dependent), Dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Under-display Fingerprint (Ultrasonic) Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Barometer |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.5 points. It wins on performance, camera and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Samsung Galaxy S22+ at PKR 151,999. That makes Samsung Galaxy S22+ cheaper by PKR 48,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Samsung Galaxy S22+ a 4500 mAh cell, with 80W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Samsung Galaxy S22+ is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Samsung Galaxy S22+ runs the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) / Exynos 2200 (4nm) in selected regions.
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.