Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Vivo V60 512GB
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo V60 512GB is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 89 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo V60 512GB is the cheaper of the two at PKR 159,999 against PKR 199,999.
Vivo V60 512GB
Vivo
PKR 159,999
89/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo V60 512GB takes it by 12.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo V60 512GB costs PKR 40,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 1,490 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo V60 512GB ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the Vivo V60 512GB if…
you care most about performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Vivo V60 512GB |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 159,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | ≈ 164.4 × 74.8 × 7.5 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | ≈ 185 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | No official IP rating |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~388 PPI) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Schott Xensation Glass (Vivo standard) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (1×2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3×2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 720 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8 GB / 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 512 GB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP (wide, OIS) 8 MP (ultra-wide) |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom | 50 MP (AF) |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30fps 1080p@30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | 5000 mAh (Li-Po, non-removable) |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 80W wired fast charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Under-display fingerprint (optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Vivo V60 512GB in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Vivo V60 512GB at PKR 159,999. That makes Vivo V60 512GB cheaper by PKR 40,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or Vivo V60 512GB?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Vivo V60 512GB a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or Vivo V60 512GB?
Vivo V60 512GB is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Vivo V60 512GB runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Vivo V60 512GB vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Vivo V60 512GB vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
Vivo V60 512GB vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
Vivo V60 512GB vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.