Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 87 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Oppo Reno 16 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 339,999.
Oppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewVivo
PKR 339,999
87/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Vivo X300 Pro takes it by 7.5 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about value for money.
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 Cheaper | PKR 339,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 226 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Arm G1-Ultra |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16 with OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom | 50 MP wide (AF) |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) Better |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Vivo X300 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 7.5 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 339,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 140,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Vivo X300 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Vivo X300 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Vivo X300 Pro leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Pro a 6510 mAh cell, with 80W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.