Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo X300
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The vivo X300 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The vivo X300 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 179,999 against PKR 199,999.
vivo X300
Vivo
PKR 179,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo X300 takes it by 13 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- vivo X300 costs PKR 20,000 less.
- vivo X300 packs a 10 mAh larger battery.
- vivo X300 charges 10W faster.
- vivo X300 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- vivo X300 ships with 768 GB more storage.
- vivo X300 has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the vivo X300 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 179,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | October 2025 (China), global rollout followed in selected markets. |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 150.6 × 71.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 190 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68/IP69 Dust & Water Resistant |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch Better | 6.31 inches |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 2640 × 1216 pixels (1.5K) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED 120Hz HDR10+ |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Crystal Shield Glass (official protection name not fully confirmed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Immortalis-G1 MC12 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16 OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.1 Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP Wide, f/1.6, OIS 50 MP Ultra-Wide 200 MP ZEISS APO Periscope Telephoto, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom ZEISS Optics Laser Autofocus HDR Panorama LED Flash Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom | 50 MP Wide Autofocus |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30/60fps 1080p Gyro-EIS OIS |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh | 6500mAh Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion battery Better |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 90W Wired FlashCharge with Wireless and Reverse Wireless Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7), Dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | v6.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Under-display Ultrasonic Fingerprint Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo X300?
vivo X300 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and vivo X300 in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and vivo X300 at PKR 179,999. That makes vivo X300 cheaper by PKR 20,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo X300?
vivo X300 scores higher in our camera assessment. Oppo Reno 16 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on vivo X300, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo X300?
vivo X300 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and vivo X300 a 6500 mAh cell, with 80W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or vivo X300?
vivo X300 is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while vivo X300 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
vivo X300 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
vivo X300 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Oppo Reno 16 vs vivo V80 Lite
vivo X300 vs vivo V80 Lite
Oppo Reno 16 vs Honor X9e Pro
vivo X300 vs Honor X9e Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.