Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco X8 Power
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco X8 Power is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 87 against 74 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. The Xiaomi Poco X8 Power is the cheaper of the two at PKR 99,999 against PKR 199,999.
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power
Poco
PKR 99,999
87/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco X8 Power takes it by 12.7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Poco X8 Power costs PKR 100,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco X8 Power packs a 3,510 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco X8 Power charges 20W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco X8 Power ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X8 Power if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | Xiaomi Poco X8 Power |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 99,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | September 4, 2026 (expected) |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 163.4 x 78.3 x 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 229.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP68/IP69K dust and water resistance. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.83-inch Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels | 1280 × 2772 pixels Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz HDR10+, 3500 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2. |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (4× 2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4× 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Adreno 812 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP (Wide) + 8 MP (Ultrawide), OIS, PDAF, LED Flash, HDR, Panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 32 MP, f/2.2, Wide, HDR, Panorama |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh | Li-Po (Non-removable) 10000 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support | 100W wired fast charging, 27W reverse wired charging. Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM, Dual SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | Bluetooth 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass. |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco X8 Power?
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.7 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Oppo Reno 16 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and Xiaomi Poco X8 Power in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and Xiaomi Poco X8 Power at PKR 99,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco X8 Power cheaper by PKR 100,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco X8 Power?
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or Xiaomi Poco X8 Power?
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco X8 Power a 10000 mAh cell, with 80W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Oppo Reno 16 vs Google Pixel 11
Xiaomi Poco X8 Power vs Google Pixel 11
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.