Oppo Reno 16
Oppo
PKR 199,999
72/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Oppo Reno 16 vs ZTE nubia A77
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Oppo Reno 16 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 72 against 67 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The ZTE nubia A77 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE nubia A77 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 42,999 against PKR 199,999.
ZTE nubia A77
Nubia
PKR 42,999
67/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedOppo Reno 16 takes it by 4.8 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- ZTE nubia A77 costs PKR 157,000 less.
- Oppo Reno 16 packs a 1,490 mAh larger battery.
- Oppo Reno 16 charges 57.5W faster.
- Oppo Reno 16 offers 6 GB more RAM.
- Oppo Reno 16 ships with 128 GB more storage.
- Oppo Reno 16 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Oppo Reno 16 if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.
Buy the ZTE nubia A77 if…
you care most about value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 16 | ZTE nubia A77 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 199,999 | PKR 42,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 2, 2026 | August 2026 |
| Dimensions | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm | 168 × 77 × 8.3 mm |
| Weight | 182 g / 193 g Better | 193 g |
| Water resistance | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K | IP64 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.32-inch | 6.75 inches Better |
| Resolution | 2640 x 1216 Pixels Better | 720 × 1640 pixels, ~265 ppi. |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Protection | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection | Scratch-resistant glass. |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) | Unisoc T8300 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz | Octa-core (2 × 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6 × 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 722 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Operating system | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 | Android 16 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X Better | 6GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 3.1 Better | 128GB |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus | 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF, LED Flash, HDR, Panorama |
| Selfie camera | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better | 8 MP |
| Video recording | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom | 1080p@30fps. |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better | 22.5W wired |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Oppo Reno 16 or ZTE nubia A77?
Oppo Reno 16 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.8 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. ZTE nubia A77 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Oppo Reno 16 and ZTE nubia A77 in Pakistan?
Oppo Reno 16 is listed at PKR 199,999 and ZTE nubia A77 at PKR 42,999. That makes ZTE nubia A77 cheaper by PKR 157,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Oppo Reno 16 or ZTE nubia A77?
Oppo Reno 16 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Oppo Reno 16 or ZTE nubia A77?
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. Oppo Reno 16 carries a 6490 mAh cell and ZTE nubia A77 a 5000 mAh cell, with 80W and 22W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Oppo Reno 16 or ZTE nubia A77?
Oppo Reno 16 is the stronger gaming phone here. Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) while ZTE nubia A77 runs the Unisoc T8300 (6 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
ZTE nubia A77 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Oppo Reno 16 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
ZTE nubia A77 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Pro
Oppo Reno 16 vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
ZTE nubia A77 vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Oppo Reno 16 vs Google Pixel 11
ZTE nubia A77 vs Google Pixel 11
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.