Sharp Aquos R9
Sharp
PKR 149,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 25 Apr 2026.
The short answer
The Sharp Aquos R9 and the Tecno Camon 30 5G finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. Sharp Aquos R9 leads on performance. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 149,999.
Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedToo close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 80,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 40W faster.
- Sharp Aquos R9 offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Sharp Aquos R9 has a 0.3 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Sharp Aquos R9 if…
you care most about performance and memory & storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about camera, battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R9 | Tecno Camon 30 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 149,999 | PKR 69,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Mid–2026 (June–July window typical for Aquos R series) | April 2024 |
| Dimensions | ~156 mm - ~74 mm _ ~8.5 – 9 mm | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 190 – 210 g Better | 199 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 (water & dust resistant — Sharp flagship standard) | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1260 × 2730 pixels (approx.) Better | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | Pro IGZO OLED, 240Hz (Sharp signature high refresh panel) | AMOLED 120Hz |
| Protection | Not listed | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (flagship-grade, efficient variant) | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| Operating system | Android 14 (expected with Sharp UI) | Android 14 HIOS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB Better | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 |
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (availability varies by market) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Main: 50.3 MP (1-inch sensor class, premium imaging) Secondary: Ultra-wide (approx. 13–50 MP depending on variant) Better | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP (approx.) HDR | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better |
| Video recording | 8K: ✔ (expected flagship standard) 4K: 30/60fps ✔ 1080p: ✔ | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po ~5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | Fast wired (~30W–45W expected) Wireless charging (Yes) | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (latest standard) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint Under-display (ultrasonic) Face Unlock Full flagship suite | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Sharp Aquos R9 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Sharp Aquos R9 and Tecno Camon 30 5G finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
What is the price of Sharp Aquos R9 and Tecno Camon 30 5G in Pakistan?
Sharp Aquos R9 is listed at PKR 149,999 and Tecno Camon 30 5G at PKR 69,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 80,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Sharp Aquos R9 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Sharp Aquos R9 uses a 50.3 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Camon 30 5G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Sharp Aquos R9 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G leads on battery. Sharp Aquos R9 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 30 5G a 5000 mAh cell, with 30W and 70W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Sharp Aquos R9 or Tecno Camon 30 5G?
Sharp Aquos R9 is the stronger gaming phone here. Sharp Aquos R9 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (flagship-grade, efficient variant) while Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Lenovo Legion Y90
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Lenovo Legion Y90
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Sharp Aquos R9 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.