Sharp Aquos R9
Sharp
PKR 149,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 25 Apr 2026.
The Sharp Aquos R9 and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. Sharp Aquos R9 leads on performance. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 65,999 against PKR 149,999.
Sharp
PKR 149,999
82/100 overall
Full specs & reviewTecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Too close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
you care most about performance and memory & storage.
you care most about camera, battery & charging and value for money.
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R9 | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 149,999 | PKR 65,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Mid–2026 (June–July window typical for Aquos R series) | April 2025 |
| Dimensions | ~156 mm - ~74 mm _ ~8.5 – 9 mm | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 – 210 g | 178 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 (water & dust resistant — Sharp flagship standard) | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6 inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1260 × 2730 pixels (approx.) Better | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | Pro IGZO OLED, 240Hz (Sharp signature high refresh panel) | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode |
| Protection | Not listed | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (flagship-grade, efficient variant) | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 (expected with Sharp UI) | Android 15 with HiOS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB Better | 256GB UFS |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Main: 50.3 MP (1-inch sensor class, premium imaging) Secondary: Ultra-wide (approx. 13–50 MP depending on variant) Better | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP (approx.) HDR | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty Better |
| Video recording | 8K: ✔ (expected flagship standard) 4K: 30/60fps ✔ 1080p: ✔ | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Po ~5000 mAh | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | Fast wired (~30W–45W expected) Wireless charging (Yes) | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (latest standard) | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint Under-display (ultrasonic) Face Unlock Full flagship suite | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Sharp Aquos R9 and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
Sharp Aquos R9 is listed at PKR 149,999 and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G at PKR 65,999. That makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G cheaper by PKR 84,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G scores higher in our camera assessment. Sharp Aquos R9 uses a 50.3 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G leads on battery. Sharp Aquos R9 carries a 5000 mAh cell and Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G a 5200 mAh cell, with 30W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Sharp Aquos R9 is the stronger gaming phone here. Sharp Aquos R9 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (flagship-grade, efficient variant) while Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G runs the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.