Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, memory & storage and value for money. The Vivo V60 Lite 5G still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 94,999.
Vivo V60 Lite 5G
Vivo
PKR 94,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 4.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 25,000 less.
- Vivo V60 Lite 5G packs a 1,500 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo V60 Lite 5G charges 20W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Vivo V60 Lite 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 5G | Vivo V60 Lite 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 69,999 Cheaper | PKR 94,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2024 | October 14, 2025 (Pakistan launch) |
| Dimensions | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm | 163.8 × 76.3 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) | IP64 — Dust resistant and protected against water splashes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 1080 × 2392 pixels (~388 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz | AMOLED, 120 Hz |
| Protection | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) | SCHOTT Xensation® Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14 | Android 15 with Funtouch 15 UI |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) | 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better | 256 GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | microSDXC (availability varies by market) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode | 50 MP wide + 8 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better | 32 MP wide |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps | 1080p/30fps+ (standard) — specific high-res video details vary by region |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | Non-removable Li-Po 6500 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) | 90 W wired FlashCharge Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (5G + 5G Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | Bluetooth 5.x |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.3 points. It wins on camera, memory & storage and value for money. Vivo V60 Lite 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 30 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is listed at PKR 69,999 and Vivo V60 Lite 5G at PKR 94,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 25,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Vivo V60 Lite 5G leads on battery. Tecno Camon 30 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo V60 Lite 5G a 6500 mAh cell, with 70W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Honor X6e
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Honor X6e
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.