Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo V60 Lite 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 80 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on memory & storage and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 94,999.
Vivo V60 Lite 5G
Vivo
PKR 94,999
80/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo V60 Lite 5G takes it by 15.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 30,000 less.
- Vivo V60 Lite 5G charges 45W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo V60 Lite 5G uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Vivo V60 Lite 5G if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and display.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo V60 Lite 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 94,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | October 14, 2025 (Pakistan launch) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 163.8 × 76.3 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 194 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | IP64 — Dust resistant and protected against water splashes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2392 pixels (~388 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, 120 Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | SCHOTT Xensation® Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (4×2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 with Funtouch 15 UI |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 12 GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP wide + 8 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 32 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 1080p/30fps+ (standard) — specific high-res video details vary by region |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) | Non-removable Li-Po 6500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 90 W wired FlashCharge Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (5G + 5G Dual Standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | Bluetooth 5.x |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Vivo V60 Lite 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 15.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo V60 Lite 5G at PKR 94,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 30,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Vivo V60 Lite 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Vivo V60 Lite 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo V60 Lite 5G a 6500 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo V60 Lite 5G?
Vivo V60 Lite 5G is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo V60 Lite 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.