Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs vivo Y400 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and memory & storage. The vivo Y400 Pro still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 89,999.
vivo Y400 Pro
Vivo
PKR 89,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 6.7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 20,000 less.
- vivo Y400 Pro packs a 500 mAh larger battery.
- vivo Y400 Pro charges 20W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 5G | vivo Y400 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 69,999 Cheaper | PKR 89,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2024 | June 2025 |
| Dimensions | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm | 163.7 × 75.0 × 7.5 mm (Nebula Purple) / 7.7 mm (Fest Gold/Freestyle White) |
| Weight | 199 g | 182 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) | IP65 (Dust-tight and resistant to water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 1080 × 2392 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz | AMOLED 120 Hz |
| Protection | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Quad-core Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz Quad-core Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14 | Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better | 128GB / 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | microSDXC (availability varies by market) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode | 50 MP, f/1.79, PDAF 2 MP Depth Sensor LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better | 32 MP |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps | Up to 4K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery Better |
| Wired charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) | 90W FlashCharge Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.4 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 30 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 6.7 points. It wins on performance, camera, memory & storage and value for money. vivo Y400 Pro can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 30 5G and vivo Y400 Pro in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is listed at PKR 69,999 and vivo Y400 Pro at PKR 89,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 20,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 30 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
Tecno Camon 30 5G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 30 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro leads on battery. Tecno Camon 30 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and vivo Y400 Pro a 5500 mAh cell, with 70W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon 30 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) while vivo Y400 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Honor X6e
vivo Y400 Pro vs Honor X6e
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.