Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs vivo Y400 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The vivo Y400 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 78 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on memory & storage and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 89,999.
vivo Y400 Pro
Vivo
PKR 89,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedvivo Y400 Pro takes it by 13 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 25,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- vivo Y400 Pro charges 45W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- vivo Y400 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the vivo Y400 Pro if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and display.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | vivo Y400 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 89,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | June 2025 |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 163.7 × 75.0 × 7.5 mm (Nebula Purple) / 7.7 mm (Fest Gold/Freestyle White) |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 182 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | IP65 (Dust-tight and resistant to water jets) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.77 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2392 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED 120 Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Not officially specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Quad-core Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz Quad-core Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB / 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP, f/1.79, PDAF 2 MP Depth Sensor LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 32 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | Up to 4K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | 5500 mAh, Non-removable Li-Po battery |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 90W FlashCharge Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band (2.4GHz & 5GHz) Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.4 A2DP LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 OTG Supported |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and vivo Y400 Pro in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and vivo Y400 Pro at PKR 89,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 25,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and vivo Y400 Pro a 5500 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or vivo Y400 Pro?
vivo Y400 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while vivo Y400 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Honor X6e
vivo Y400 Pro vs Honor X6e
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
vivo Y400 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.