Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno
PKR 69,999
83/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Xiaomi 17
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 83 against 77 on our combined specification score. It leads on battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. The Xiaomi 17 still wins on performance and camera, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 30 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 69,999 against PKR 264,999.
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi
PKR 264,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 30 5G takes it by 6.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Camon 30 5G costs PKR 195,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G packs a 500 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G charges 25W faster.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 30 5G ships with 256 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi 17 if…
you care most about performance and camera.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 30 5G | Xiaomi 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 69,999 Cheaper | PKR 264,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2024 | September 2025 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | Glass Back: 165.4 × 75.9 × 7.8 mm Eco Leather: 165.4 × 75.9 × 8.0 mm | 161.3 × 76.6 × 7.4 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 (Dust protected & splash resistant) | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 1080 × 2340 pixels (~385 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED 120Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, HDR10+, 120Hz |
| Protection | Basic reinforced glass (manufacturer not disclosed) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A78 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Deca-core (1×3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Xclipse 940 |
| Operating system | Android 14 HIOS 14 | Android 15 with One UI 7 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Memory Fusion (Extended RAM) supported) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB UFS 2.2 Better | 256 GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (availability varies by market) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.9 aperture PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary 2 MP Depth Sensor Auxiliary Light Sensor Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Portrait Mode Night Mode | 50 MP wide (OIS) + 8 MP telephoto (3× optical zoom) + 12 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP Autofocus (AF) Dual Color Temperature Flash Better | 12 MP wide |
| Video recording | 1440p @30fps 1080p @30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Ion / Si-Ca ~4500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 70W Ultra Charge (Wired) 0–50%: Approximately 19 minutes 0–100%: Approximately 45–50 minutes (under optimal conditions) Better | 45W wired, 15W wireless, reverse wireless |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68 dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Tecno Camon 30 5G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 6.3 points. It wins on battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Xiaomi 17 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 30 5G and Xiaomi 17 in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 30 5G is listed at PKR 69,999 and Xiaomi 17 at PKR 264,999. That makes Tecno Camon 30 5G cheaper by PKR 195,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Tecno Camon 30 5G leads on battery. Tecno Camon 30 5G carries a 5000 mAh cell and Xiaomi 17 a 4500 mAh cell, with 70W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Camon 30 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 30 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (6nm) while Xiaomi 17 runs the Exynos 2400 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Tecno Camon 30 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Xiaomi 17 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.