Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Xiaomi 17
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi 17 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 77 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 264,999.
Xiaomi 17
Xiaomi
PKR 264,999
77/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi 17 takes it by 12.3 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 200,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 2,000 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi 17 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Xiaomi 17 if…
you care most about performance, camera and display.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Xiaomi 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 264,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | September 2025 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 161.3 × 76.6 × 7.4 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 190 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2340 pixels (~385 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, HDR10+, 120Hz |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Deca-core (1×3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2×2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.95 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Xclipse 940 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 with One UI 7 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8 GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 256 GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP wide (OIS) + 8 MP telephoto (3× optical zoom) + 12 MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 12 MP wide Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Non-removable Li-Ion / Si-Ca ~4500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 45W wired, 15W wireless, reverse wireless |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM (IP68 dust/water resistant) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.3 points. It wins on performance, camera and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Xiaomi 17 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Xiaomi 17 at PKR 264,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 200,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Xiaomi 17 a 4500 mAh cell, with 45W and 45W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Xiaomi 17?
Xiaomi 17 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Xiaomi 17 runs the Exynos 2400 (4 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Xiaomi 17 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Xiaomi 17 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.