Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 90 against 81 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 65,999 against PKR 339,999.
Tecno
PKR 65,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewVivo
PKR 339,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Vivo X300 Pro takes it by 9.2 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about value for money.
you care most about performance, battery & charging and memory & storage.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 65,999 Cheaper | PKR 339,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2025 | Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm | 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 178 g Better | 226 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) | IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode | 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) |
| CPU | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Arm G1-Ultra |
| Operating system | Android 15 with HiOS 15 | Android 16 with OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) | 12 GB / 16 GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion | 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide Better |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty | 50 MP wide (AF) |
| Video recording | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh | Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) Better |
| Wired charging | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) | 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Vivo X300 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 9.2 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging and memory & storage. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is listed at PKR 65,999 and Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 339,999. That makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G cheaper by PKR 274,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Vivo X300 Pro leads on battery. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G carries a 5200 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Pro a 6510 mAh cell, with 45W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G runs the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) while Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.