TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno
PKR 64,999
80/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Vivo Y600 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition and the Vivo Y600 Pro finish within three points of each other on our combined specification score, so neither is a clear winner. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition leads on battery & charging. The TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 97,999.
Vivo Y600 Pro
Vivo
PKR 97,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedToo close to call. These two finish within three points of each other, so the right answer depends on which category matters most to you.
What actually differs
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition costs PKR 33,000 less.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition charges 26W faster.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition has a 44 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition | Vivo Y600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 97,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | March 2024 Free Fire Edition released in selected markets during 2024 | April 2026 |
| Dimensions | 166.2 × 76.8 × 7.9 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | Approximately 195 g | Not listed |
| Water resistance | IP53 Dust protected (limited dust ingress) Protected against water splashes from any direction | No confirmed protection |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (Full HD+) Better | 1080 x 2400 pixels (FHD+) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate Up to 1,300 nits TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light certification, Dynamic Port, adaptive refresh rate (up to 120Hz). | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | Panda Glass protection (market dependent) | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity series (expected mid-range 5G SoC) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G series |
| Operating system | Android 14 (HiOS 14) | Android 15 (with Funtouch OS) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Supports Memory Fusion (up to 12GB extended RAM, depending on variant) | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | No | Yes (microSD, shared SIM slot likely) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP main camera AI depth/light sensor Dual LED Flash Better | 64 MP (wide) MP (depth/macro) 2 MP (depth/macro) LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP selfie camera Dual LED Flash Better | 16 MP |
| Video recording | 2K at 30fps 1080p at 60fps 1080p at 30fps | 1080p / 4K (expected) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better | Li-Po, non-removable 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 70W Fast Charging, Bypass Charging, Reverse Wired Charging Better | Fast charging (44W / 66W expected) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | v5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope (virtual/software-assisted) Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Electronic Compass | Fingerprint (under-display or side-mounted) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo Y600 Pro?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition and Vivo Y600 Pro finish within a few points of each other, so neither is a clear winner on paper. Pick the one that leads in the category you care about most.
What is the price of TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition and Vivo Y600 Pro in Pakistan?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y600 Pro at PKR 97,999. That makes TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition cheaper by PKR 33,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo Y600 Pro?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition leads on battery. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition carries a 6000 mAh cell and Vivo Y600 Pro a 5000 mAh cell, with 70W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.