Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo Y600 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y600 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 81 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 97,999.
Vivo Y600 Pro
Vivo
PKR 97,999
81/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y600 Pro takes it by 15.9 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 33,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,500 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G charges 1W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo Y600 Pro has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Vivo Y600 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y600 Pro if…
you care most about camera and display.
Not enough published data to score: Performance. Those categories are excluded from the overall figure rather than estimated.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo Y600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 97,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | April 2026 |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | Not listed |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | Not listed |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | No confirmed protection |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 x 2400 pixels (FHD+) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | MediaTek Dimensity series (expected mid-range 5G SoC) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G series |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 15 (with Funtouch OS) |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB / 256GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | Yes (microSD, shared SIM slot likely) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 64 MP (wide) MP (depth/macro) 2 MP (depth/macro) LED flash, HDR, panorama Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 16 MP Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 1080p / 4K (expected) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Li-Po, non-removable 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging Better | Fast charging (44W / 66W expected) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual standby) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under-display or side-mounted) Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity sensor Compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 15.9 points. It wins on camera and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo Y600 Pro in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y600 Pro at PKR 97,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 33,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Vivo Y600 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 50 5G uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Vivo Y600 Pro, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y600 Pro?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo Y600 Pro a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 44W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo Y600 Pro vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y600 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.