Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno
PKR 59,999
74/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Vivo Y73
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Spark 30 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 74 against 69 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, battery & charging and value for money. The Vivo Y73 still wins on camera and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 30 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 59,999 against PKR 89,999.
Vivo Y73
Vivo
PKR 89,999
69/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Spark 30 Pro takes it by 5.1 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 30 Pro costs PKR 30,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 30 Pro packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo Y73 ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Tecno Spark 30 Pro has a 44 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Tecno Spark 30 Pro if…
you care most about performance, battery & charging and value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y73 if…
you care most about camera and memory & storage.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 30 Pro | Vivo Y73 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 59,999 Cheaper | PKR 89,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2024 | June 2021 (available in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 166.6 × 77 × 7.4 mm | 161.2 × 74.3 × 7.4 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 170g Better |
| Water resistance | IP54 Dust & Splash Resistant | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 Inches Better | 6.44 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 Pixels (Full HD+) Better | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~409 ppi density) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 1 Billion Colors 120Hz Always-On Display (AOD) Punch-hole design 10-bit color support Wet Touch technology Multi-touch capacitive touchscreen | AMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ) |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Schott Xensation Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm) | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2× Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6× Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (2×2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| Operating system | Android 14 with HiOS 14.5 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB (Up to 8GB Memory Fusion) | 8GB + 3GB Extended |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB internal storage (expandable up to 1TB) Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (Dedicated slot, market dependent) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP, Wide, f/1.9, PDAF (Auto Focus) Secondary Camera: Auxiliary AI Lens Quad-LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Camera Super Night Mode Portrait Mode Pro Mode Time-Lapse Slow Motion Document Scanner Beauty Mode Better | 64 MP (wide) + 2 MP (macro) + 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 13MP Dual-color LED Flash HDR | 16 MP (wide) Better |
| Video recording | 1440p (2K) 1080p @30fps 720p @30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (rear) / 1080p@30fps (front) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33W Fast Charging | 33W wired, 61% in 30 min (advertised) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi Direct Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Under-Display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Electronic Compass Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Vivo Y73?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.1 points. It wins on performance, battery & charging and value for money. Vivo Y73 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 30 Pro and Vivo Y73 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro is listed at PKR 59,999 and Vivo Y73 at PKR 89,999. That makes Tecno Spark 30 Pro cheaper by PKR 30,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Vivo Y73?
Vivo Y73 scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 30 Pro uses a 108 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Vivo Y73, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Vivo Y73?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro leads on battery. Tecno Spark 30 Pro carries a 5000 mAh cell and Vivo Y73 a 4000 mAh cell, with 33W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 30 Pro or Vivo Y73?
Tecno Spark 30 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 30 Pro runs the MediaTek Helio G100 (6nm) while Vivo Y73 runs the Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Honor X6e
Vivo Y73 vs Honor X6e
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs OnePlus N6x
Vivo Y73 vs OnePlus N6x
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y73 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y73 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.