Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
65/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo Y73
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y73 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 70 against 65 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Tecno Spark 50 5G is the cheaper of the two at PKR 64,999 against PKR 89,999.
Vivo Y73
Vivo
PKR 89,999
70/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y73 takes it by 5.1 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Tecno Spark 50 5G costs PKR 25,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 2,500 mAh larger battery.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G charges 12W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Vivo Y73 ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Vivo Y73 has a 14 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
- Vivo Y73 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Buy the Vivo Y73 if…
you care most about performance, camera and display.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo Y73 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 Cheaper | PKR 89,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | June 2021 (available in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 161.2 × 74.3 × 7.4 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 170g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.44 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~409 ppi density) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ) |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Schott Xensation Glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (2×2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8GB + 3GB Extended |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 | 128GB internal storage (expandable up to 1TB) Better |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 64 MP (wide) + 2 MP (macro) + 2 MP (depth) Better |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 16 MP (wide) Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (rear) / 1080p@30fps (front) |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Non-removable Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging Better | 33W wired, 61% in 30 min (advertised) |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y73?
Vivo Y73 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.1 points. It wins on performance, camera and display. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo Y73 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y73 at PKR 89,999. That makes Tecno Spark 50 5G cheaper by PKR 25,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y73?
Vivo Y73 scores higher in our camera assessment. Tecno Spark 50 5G uses a 50 MP main sensor against 64 MP on Vivo Y73, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y73?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo Y73 a 4000 mAh cell, with 45W and 33W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y73?
Vivo Y73 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo Y73 runs the Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y73 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Honor X6e
Vivo Y73 vs Honor X6e
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y73 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y73 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.