vivo X200
Vivo
PKR 214,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
vivo X200 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 8 Jul 2026.
The short answer
The ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 96 against 90 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The vivo X200 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The vivo X200 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 214,999 against PKR 249,999.
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Nubia
PKR 249,999
96/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedZTE nubia NaviX Ultra takes it by 6.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- vivo X200 costs PKR 35,000 less.
- ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra packs a 1,300 mAh larger battery.
- ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the vivo X200 if…
you care most about value for money.
Buy the ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera and battery & charging.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | vivo X200 | ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 214,999 Cheaper | PKR 249,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | October 2024 (China), Global rollout started later in 2024 | September 16, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 160.3 × 74.8 × 8.0 mm (varies slightly by color) | 162.1 × 75.7 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | Approx. 197–202 g Better | 208 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 Dust & Water Resistant IP69 High-pressure Water Resistant | IP68/IP69-rated protection. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.67 inches | 6.78 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1260 × 2800 pixels (1.5K) | 1260 × 2800 pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED 120Hz Adaptive HDR10+ | LTPO OLED 144Hz 10-bit, 1 billion colors Up to 4,500 nits |
| Protection | Schott Xensation Alpha Glass | Not reliably specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core Qualcomm Oryon, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with OriginOS 5 (China) / Funtouch OS 15 (Global) | Android 16 Nebula AIOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB UFS 4.0 | 512GB / 1TB |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP Wide (OIS) 50 MP Periscope Telephoto (3x Optical Zoom, OIS) 50 MP Ultra-Wide ZEISS Optics Laser Autofocus HDR Panorama LED Flash Super Night Mode Portrait Mode Macro Photography | 200MP + 50MP Ultra-wide + 64MP Periscope Telephoto, OIS Better |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP Autofocus HDR | 32MP OIS, autofocus, LED flash, HDR, panorama, AI Image Master |
| Video recording | 8K 4K at up to 60fps 1080p Slow Motion Gyro-EIS OIS | 4K video recording, OIS, EIS, AI video processing. |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Silicon-Carbon Li-Ion (Non-removable) 5800mAh | Li-Po / Silicon-Carbon 7100 mAh, non-removable Better |
| Wired charging | 90W FlashCharge Reverse Wired Charging | 90W wired, 50W wireless, reverse wireless charging, reverse wired charging. |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (market dependent) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7, Dual-Band | Wi-Fi 7, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be, tri-band (2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz), 2×2 MIMO. |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | Bluetooth 6.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Electronic Compass Color Temperature Sensor | Fingerprint (ultrasonic, under-display), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass, ambient light sensor, infrared sensor. |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, vivo X200 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 6.4 points. It wins on performance, camera and battery & charging. vivo X200 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of vivo X200 and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra in Pakistan?
vivo X200 is listed at PKR 214,999 and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra at PKR 249,999. That makes vivo X200 cheaper by PKR 35,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, vivo X200 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. vivo X200 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, vivo X200 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra leads on battery. vivo X200 carries a 5800 mAh cell and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra a 7100 mAh cell, with 90W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, vivo X200 or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. vivo X200 runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) while ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
vivo X200 vs Oppo Reno 16
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
vivo X200 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
vivo X200 vs vivo V80 Lite
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs vivo V80 Lite
vivo X200 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.