Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Poco
PKR 289,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 6 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 97 against 90 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and value for money. The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra is the cheaper of the two at PKR 249,999 against PKR 289,999.
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Nubia
PKR 249,999
97/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedZTE nubia NaviX Ultra takes it by 7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra costs PKR 40,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra packs a 950 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra charges 10W faster.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra if…
you care most about performance and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra | ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 289,999 | PKR 249,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 2026 | September 16, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm | 162.1 × 75.7 × 7.6 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 208 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68/IP69-rated protection. |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9-inch Better | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 × 2608 pixels | 1260 × 2800 pixels Better |
| Panel type | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness | LTPO OLED 144Hz 10-bit, 1 billion colors Up to 4,500 nits |
| Protection | Gorilla Glass 7i | Not reliably specified |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz | Octa-core Qualcomm Oryon, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 | Adreno 840 |
| Operating system | Android 16, HyperOS 3. | Android 16 Nebula AIOS 2 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X | 12GB / 16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, | 512GB / 1TB |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 | 200MP + 50MP Ultra-wide + 64MP Periscope Telephoto, OIS |
| Selfie camera | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode | 32MP OIS, autofocus, LED flash, HDR, panorama, AI Image Master |
| Video recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps | 4K video recording, OIS, EIS, AI video processing. |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh Better | Li-Po / Silicon-Carbon 7100 mAh, non-removable |
| Wired charging | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging Better | 90W wired, 50W wireless, reverse wireless charging, reverse wired charging. |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby (Dual SIM) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7, 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be, tri-band (2.4GHz + 5GHz + 6GHz), 2×2 MIMO. |
| Bluetooth | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth | Bluetooth 6.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor | Fingerprint (ultrasonic, under-display), accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity, compass, ambient light sensor, infrared sensor. |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 7 points. It wins on performance and value for money. Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra in Pakistan?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is listed at PKR 289,999 and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra at PKR 249,999. That makes ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra cheaper by PKR 40,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra leads on battery. Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra carries a 8050 mAh cell and ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra a 7100 mAh cell, with 100W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra or ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra?
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) while ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Google Pixel 11
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Vivo X500 Ultra
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Vivo X500 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.