Vivo X300 Ultra
Vivo
PKR 253,999
91/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X8
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Jul 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 91 against 78 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Xiaomi Poco X8 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Poco X8 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 74,999 against PKR 253,999.
Xiaomi Poco X8
Poco
PKR 74,999
78/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo X300 Ultra takes it by 13 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Poco X8 costs PKR 179,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco X8 packs a 1,830 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo X300 Ultra charges 53W faster.
- Vivo X300 Ultra offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo X300 Ultra ships with 768 GB more storage.
- Vivo X300 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Vivo X300 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X8 if…
you care most about value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco X8 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 253,999 | PKR 74,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 30, 2026 (expected in Pakistan) | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 164.3 × 76.4 × 8.5 mm | 163.45 × 78.27 × 8.60 mm |
| Weight | 228 g | 223 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistance. | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8 inches | 6.83-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~452 ppi) | 1280 × 2772 pixels Better |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED 120Hz refresh rate 12-bit color depth, 3500 nits peak brightness, 3840Hz PWM dimming, DCI-P3, |
| Protection | Not officially specified | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm), |
| CPU | Octa-core (up to 4.6 GHz) | Octa-core (4×2.4GHz Cortex-A78 + 4×1.8GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 710 |
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB / 16 GB Better | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X |
| Internal storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB (UFS 4.1) Better | UFS 2.2 (128GB) / UFS 3.1 (256GB) |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP (wide, OIS) + 50 MP periscope telephoto (OIS, 3× optical zoom) + 50 MP ultra-wide Better | 50MP, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF, 1/2.76" sensor, 0.64µm pixel size, 5P lens + 2MP depth sensor, f/2.4, LED flash. |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP wide Better | 16MP, f/2.4, 5P lens, 1.0µm pixel size, Fixed Focus, HDR |
| Video recording | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps (Front & Rear), 720p@30fps, Gyro-EIS. |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion 6510 mAh (Si-C battery) | Silicon-Carbon battery, (Non-removable) 8340mAh (Global), 9000mAh (India) Better |
| Wired charging | 120W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse charging Better | 67W wired charging, 22.5W reverse wired charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM + eSIM (IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant) | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under-display optical), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Electronic Compass, Infrared Sensor. |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco X8?
Vivo X300 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. Xiaomi Poco X8 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco X8 in Pakistan?
Vivo X300 Ultra is listed at PKR 253,999 and Xiaomi Poco X8 at PKR 74,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco X8 cheaper by PKR 179,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco X8?
Vivo X300 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Vivo X300 Ultra uses a 200 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Xiaomi Poco X8, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco X8?
Vivo X300 Ultra leads on battery. Vivo X300 Ultra carries a 6510 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco X8 a 8340 mAh cell, with 120W and 67W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Vivo X300 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco X8?
Vivo X300 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo X300 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 5) while Xiaomi Poco X8 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm),.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Xiaomi Poco X8 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco X8 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Xiaomi Poco X8 vs Oppo Reno 16
Vivo X300 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco X8 vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.