Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
Huawei
PKR 433,999
90/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Pro
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 12 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 97 against 90 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, memory & storage and value for money. The Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo X300 Pro is the cheaper of the two at PKR 339,999 against PKR 433,999.
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo
PKR 339,999
97/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo X300 Pro takes it by 7 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo X300 Pro costs PKR 94,000 less.
- Vivo X300 Pro packs a 510 mAh larger battery.
- Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max charges 10W faster.
- Vivo X300 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo X300 Pro ships with 512 GB more storage.
Buy the Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if…
you care most about performance, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 433,999 | PKR 339,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | July 14, 2026 | Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 164 x 77.1 x 8.1 mm | 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm |
| Weight | 230.5 g | 226 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP68 + IP69 | IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9 inches Better | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 2880 x 1308 pixels(460 ppi) Better | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) |
| Panel type | LTPO OLED 120Hz adaptive 1.07 billion colors HDR | 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Anti-reflection and scratch-resistant Kunlun Glass | Not listed |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Kirin 9030S | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 1 x 2.7GHz Taishan Big + 3 x 2.15GHz Taishan Mid + 4 x 1.62GHz Taishan Little | Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) |
| GPU | Maleoon 935F | Arm G1-Ultra |
| Operating system | EMUI 16.0 | Android 16 with OriginOS 6 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB | 12 GB / 16 GB Better |
| Internal storage | 512GB Internal Storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP Main (OIS, variable aperture) + 200MP Telephoto (OIS, 4x optical zoom) + 40MP Ultra-Wide | 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide |
| Selfie camera | 13MP. | 50 MP wide (AF) Better |
| Video recording | up to 4K@30/60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6000 mAh, Non-removable | Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) Better |
| Wired charging | 100W HUAWEI SuperCharge HUAWEI SuperCharge Wireless Reverse Wireless Charging: Supported; some market sources specify up to 18W Better | 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, LDAC | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Compass, Hall Sensor, Barometer, Infrared Sensor, Laser Sensor, Color Temperature Sensor, Gesture Sensor. | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG supported | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max or Vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo X300 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 7 points. It wins on performance, memory & storage and value for money. Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max and Vivo X300 Pro in Pakistan?
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max is listed at PKR 433,999 and Vivo X300 Pro at PKR 339,999. That makes Vivo X300 Pro cheaper by PKR 94,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max or Vivo X300 Pro?
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max leads on battery. Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max carries a 6000 mAh cell and Vivo X300 Pro a 6510 mAh cell, with 100W and 90W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max or Vivo X300 Pro?
Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max runs the Kirin 9030S while Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Vivo X300 Pro vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Vivo X300 Pro vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Vivo X300 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.