Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo
PKR 339,999
93/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Jul 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 93 against 88 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and memory & storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is the cheaper of the two at PKR 174,999 against PKR 339,999.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Redmi
PKR 174,999
88/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo X300 Pro takes it by 5.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max costs PKR 165,000 less.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max packs a 2,700 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max charges 10W faster.
- Vivo X300 Pro offers 4 GB more RAM.
- Vivo X300 Pro ships with 512 GB more storage.
- Vivo X300 Pro has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if…
you care most about performance and memory & storage.
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 339,999 | PKR 174,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) | Expected in 2026 |
| Dimensions | 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm | 163.4 × 78.3 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 226 g Better | Approximately 229.5 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets | IP68-rated protection; exact Xiaomi test conditions to be confirmed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches | 6.83 inches Better |
| Resolution | 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) | 1280 × 2772 pixels Better |
| Panel type | 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED |
| Protection | Not listed | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported |
| CPU | Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) | Octa-core |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Mali GPU |
| Operating system | Android 16 with OriginOS 6 | Android 16 HyperOS 3 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB / 16 GB Better | 8GB / 12GB |
| Internal storage | 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better | 256GB / 512GB UFS |
| Card slot | No | Dedicated microSDXC Slot |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide Better | 50MP + 8MP — reported OIS, PDAF, HDR, Panorama, LED Flash |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP wide (AF) Better | 32MP |
| Video recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | Up to 4K — reported |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) | Si/C Li-Ion (Silicon-Carbon) Battery 9210 mAh Non-removable Better |
| Wired charging | 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging | 100W wired fast charging Reverse Charging 22.5W wired Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint Sensor Under-display Accelerometer Gyroscope Proximity Sensor Compass Ambient Light Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Vivo X300 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Vivo X300 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.2 points. It wins on performance and memory & storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max in Pakistan?
Vivo X300 Pro is listed at PKR 339,999 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max at PKR 174,999. That makes Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max cheaper by PKR 165,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Vivo X300 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max leads on battery. Vivo X300 Pro carries a 6510 mAh cell and Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max a 9210 mAh cell, with 90W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Vivo X300 Pro or Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max?
Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) while Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max runs the MediaTek Dimensity 7500 — reported.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Vivo X300 Pro vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Phantom V Fold 2
Vivo X300 Pro vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro Max
Vivo X300 Pro vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Huawei nova 16 SE
Vivo X300 Pro vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.