iPhone 17 Slim
Apple
PKR 389,999
70/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 Jan 2026.
The Oppo Reno 16 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 79 against 70 on our combined specification score. It leads on battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. The iPhone 17 Slim still wins on performance and camera, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Oppo Reno 16 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 199,999 against PKR 389,999.
Apple
PKR 389,999
70/100 overall
Full specs & reviewOppo
PKR 199,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Oppo Reno 16 takes it by 9.6 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance and camera.
you care most about battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
| Specification | iPhone 17 Slim | Oppo Reno 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 389,999 | PKR 199,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Late September–October 2025 (expected) | July 2, 2026 |
| Dimensions | 159.9 × 72.8 × ~6.0 mm (expected, ultra-thin design) | 151.2 x 72.4 x 8.2/8.4 mm |
| Weight | 170–175 g Better | 182 g / 193 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP66 / IP68 / IP69 / IP69K |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6 inches Better | 6.32-inch |
| Resolution | 1290 × 2796 pixels (~460 ppi) Better | 2640 x 1216 Pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 120Hz ProMotion | AMOLED 120Hz Refresh Rate, 460 PPI, 1.07 Billion Colors, 10-bit Color Depth, 1800 nits HBM Brightness, 100% DCI-P3, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Ceramic Shield Glass | Crystal Guard+ AMOLED Protection |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 (3 nm, expected) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) |
| CPU | Hexa-core (Apple custom cores) | Octa-Core, 1×2.8GHz + 4×2.4GHz + 3×1.8GHz |
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core or higher, expected) | Adreno 722 |
| Operating system | iOS 19 (expected) | Android 16, ColorOS 16.0 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 256 GB | 256GB UFS 3.1 |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | • 48 MP wide (sensor-shift OIS) • 12 MP ultra-wide | 50MP, f/1.8, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.8, 3.5x Optical Zoom, 2-axis OIS, PDAF + 50MP, f/2.0, 116° Ultrawide, Autofocus Better |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP (AF, TrueDepth) | 50MP, f/2.0, 100° FOV, 5P Lens, Autofocus, HDR, Portrait, Night Mode, Panorama, Retouch, Up to 2x Digital Zoom Better |
| Video recording | 4K@24/30/60fps, HDR, Dolby Vision, ProRes support | 4K@60/30fps, 1080p@60/30fps, 720p@30fps, EIS/OIS, 1080p Slow Motion@120fps, 720p Slow Motion@240/120fps, HDR Video, Time-Lapse, Dual-View Video, Up to 3.5x Optical Zoom & 18x Digital Zoom |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion (~3300–3500 mAh, expected due to thin body) | Si/C Li-Ion, Non-Removable 6490mAh Better |
| Wired charging | • Wired fast charging (≈27W) • MagSafe wireless charging • Reverse wired charging (limited) | 80W SUPERVOOC Fast Charging, 55W PPS, 13.5W USB PD & 13.5W QC Support Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual eSIM (international) | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E / Wi-Fi 7 (expected) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Dual-Band, 5GHz 160MHz, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi Direct, 2x2 MIMO |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LHDC 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Colour Temperature Sensor, E-Compass, In-display Optical Fingerprint Sensor, Infrared Remote Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C (USB 3, per EU compliance) | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Oppo Reno 16 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 9.6 points. It wins on battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. iPhone 17 Slim can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
iPhone 17 Slim is listed at PKR 389,999 and Oppo Reno 16 at PKR 199,999. That makes Oppo Reno 16 cheaper by PKR 190,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
iPhone 17 Slim scores higher in our camera assessment. iPhone 17 Slim uses a 48 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Oppo Reno 16, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Oppo Reno 16 leads on battery. iPhone 17 Slim carries a 3500 mAh cell and Oppo Reno 16 a 6490 mAh cell, with 27W and 80W wired charging respectively.
iPhone 17 Slim is the stronger gaming phone here. iPhone 17 Slim runs the Apple A19 (3 nm, expected) while Oppo Reno 16 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.