Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB
Samsung
PKR 254,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 16 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 79 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB is the cheaper of the two at PKR 254,999 against PKR 289,999.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Poco
PKR 289,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F9 Ultra takes it by 12.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB costs PKR 35,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra packs a 3,150 mAh larger battery.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra charges 55W faster.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra ships with 512 GB more storage.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra has a 150 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra if…
you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 254,999 Cheaper | PKR 289,999 |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | 4 September 2025 (official Pakistan availability) | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 76.6 x 7.4 mm | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm |
| Weight | 190 g Better | 235 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7 in | 6.9-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2340 pixels | 1200 × 2608 pixels Better |
| Panel type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X 120 Hz | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Deca-core (1×3.2GHz Cortex-X4 + 2×2.9GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.6GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.95GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 |
| Operating system | Android 16 with One UI 8 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 512 GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP + 8 MP + 12 MP triple camera | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 Better |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode Better |
| Video recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Non-removable Li-Ion Si-Ca 4900 mAh | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 45W wired, 15W wireless | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under-display optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 12.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra in Pakistan?
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB is listed at PKR 254,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra at PKR 289,999. That makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB cheaper by PKR 35,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra leads on battery. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB carries a 4900 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra a 8050 mAh cell, with 45W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB runs the Exynos 2400 (4 nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB vs Oppo Reno 16
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 512GB vs vivo V80 Lite
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs vivo V80 Lite
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.