Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno
PKR 65,999
80/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Vivo Y200
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 5 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 80 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera and memory & storage. The Vivo Y200 still wins on battery & charging and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y200 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 57,999 against PKR 65,999.
Vivo Y200
Vivo
PKR 57,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTecno Camon 40 Pro 4G takes it by 4.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y200 costs PKR 8,000 less.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G packs a 200 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo Y200 charges 35W faster.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G ships with 128 GB more storage.
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G if…
you care most about camera and memory & storage.
Buy the Vivo Y200 if…
you care most about battery & charging and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G | Vivo Y200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 65,999 | PKR 57,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2025 | 2024 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 × 74.3 × 7.3 mm | 164.1 × 74.8 × 7.95 mm |
| Weight | 178 g Better | 188 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 dust and water resistant (up to 2m for 30 minutes, high-pressure water jets) | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (FHD+) Better | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~395 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz, Always-On Display Curved AMOLED display 120Hz adaptive refresh rate Always-On Display Multi-touch support Up to 1300 nits peak brightness 10-bit color support Eye-care mode | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Schott Xensation glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| CPU | 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz | Octa-core (4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with HiOS 15 | Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB LPDDR4X (Up to 8GB Virtual RAM (16GB total memory) Better | 8 GB + 8 GB Extended |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS Better | 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated microSDXC Slot | Yes, microSD up to 1TB |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50MP f/1.9 Aperture 23mm Wide Lens 1/1.56" Sensor PDAF Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Secondary Camera 8MP Ultra-Wide Dual LED Flash HDR Panorama Flicker Sensor AI Photography Night Mode Portrait Mode Super Night AI Eraser AI Image Expansion | 50 MP (wide, OIS) + 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 50MP Autofocus (AF) f/2.5 PDAF HDR AI Beauty Better | 32 MP (wide) |
| Video recording | 4K @30fps 4K HDR @60fps (market dependent) 1080p Recording Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) | 1080p@30fps, HDR, Dual-View Video |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 5200 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Flash Charge 50% Charge: About 23 Minutes 100% Charge: About 43 Minutes AI Smart Charging Long-life Battery (Rated for approximately 1,800 charging cycles) | 80W wired fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby | Dual Nano-SIM, IP54 dust and splash resistant |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Dual-Band Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 A2DP LE | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Under-display Optical Fingerprint Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope Compass Proximity Sensor Ambient Light Sensor Geomagnetic Sensor Electronic Compass Infrared Remote Sensor | In-display fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y200?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 4.2 points. It wins on camera and memory & storage. Vivo Y200 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G and Vivo Y200 in Pakistan?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G is listed at PKR 65,999 and Vivo Y200 at PKR 57,999. That makes Vivo Y200 cheaper by PKR 8,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y200?
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G or Vivo Y200?
Vivo Y200 leads on battery. Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G carries a 5200 mAh cell and Vivo Y200 a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo Y200 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.