TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno
PKR 64,999
79/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Vivo Y200
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 4 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 79 against 76 on our combined specification score. It leads on battery & charging and memory & storage. The Vivo Y200 still wins on camera and value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y200 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 57,999 against PKR 64,999.
Vivo Y200
Vivo
PKR 57,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedTECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition takes it by 3.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y200 costs PKR 7,000 less.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition packs a 1,000 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo Y200 charges 10W faster.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition offers 4 GB more RAM.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition ships with 128 GB more storage.
- TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition has a 58 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
Buy the TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Vivo Y200 if…
you care most about camera and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition | Vivo Y200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 | PKR 57,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | March 2024 Free Fire Edition released in selected markets during 2024 | 2024 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 166.2 × 76.8 × 7.9 mm | 164.1 × 74.8 × 7.95 mm |
| Weight | Approximately 195 g | 188 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP53 Dust protected (limited dust ingress) Protected against water splashes from any direction | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2436 pixels (Full HD+) Better | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~395 ppi) |
| Panel type | AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate Up to 1,300 nits TÜV Rheinland Low Blue Light certification, Dynamic Port, adaptive refresh rate (up to 120Hz). | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Panda Glass protection (market dependent) | Schott Xensation glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz 6 × Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz | Octa-core (4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 14 (HiOS 14) | Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB LPDDR4X (Supports Memory Fusion (up to 12GB extended RAM, depending on variant) Better | 8 GB + 8 GB Extended |
| Internal storage | 256GB UFS 2.2 Better | 128 GB |
| Card slot | No | Yes, microSD up to 1TB |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP main camera AI depth/light sensor Dual LED Flash Better | 50 MP (wide, OIS) + 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP selfie camera Dual LED Flash | 32 MP (wide) |
| Video recording | 2K at 30fps 1080p at 60fps 1080p at 30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR, Dual-View Video |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-Ion (non-removable) 6000 mAh Better | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 70W Fast Charging, Bypass Charging, Reverse Wired Charging | 80W wired fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, IP54 dust and splash resistant |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.3 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | In-display fingerprint sensor Face Unlock Accelerometer Gyroscope (virtual/software-assisted) Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor Electronic Compass | In-display fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo Y200?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 3.4 points. It wins on battery & charging and memory & storage. Vivo Y200 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition and Vivo Y200 in Pakistan?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y200 at PKR 57,999. That makes Vivo Y200 cheaper by PKR 7,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo Y200?
Vivo Y200 scores higher in our camera assessment. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition uses a 108 MP main sensor against 50 MP on Vivo Y200, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Which phone has the better battery, TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition or Vivo Y200?
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition leads on battery. TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition carries a 6000 mAh cell and Vivo Y200 a 5000 mAh cell, with 70W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Keep looking
Related comparisons
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Spark 50 5G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.