Tecno Spark 50 5G
Tecno
PKR 64,999
62/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo Y200
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Aug 2026.
The short answer
The Vivo Y200 is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 76 against 62 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and display. The Tecno Spark 50 5G still wins on battery & charging and memory & storage, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Vivo Y200 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 57,999 against PKR 64,999.
Vivo Y200
Vivo
PKR 57,999
76/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedVivo Y200 takes it by 13.4 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Vivo Y200 costs PKR 7,000 less.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G packs a 1,500 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo Y200 charges 35W faster.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G offers 8 GB more RAM.
- Tecno Spark 50 5G ships with 128 GB more storage.
- Vivo Y200 uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.
Buy the Tecno Spark 50 5G if…
you care most about battery & charging and memory & storage.
Buy the Vivo Y200 if…
you care most about performance, camera, display and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Vivo Y200 |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 64,999 | PKR 57,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | April 2, 2026 (Global Announcement) | 2024 (expected in Pakistan) |
| Dimensions | 167.9 × 79.3 × 8.18 mm | 164.1 × 74.8 × 7.95 mm |
| Weight | Around 205–210 g (varies by market) | 188 g Better |
| Water resistance | IP64 Dust and Water Resistance | Not listed |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.78 inches Better | 6.67 inches |
| Resolution | 720 × 1600 pixels (HD+) | 1080 × 2400 pixels (~395 ppi) Better |
| Panel type | IPS LCD Up to 700 nits (HBM) 120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate Eye Care Mode Reading Mode Dark Mode | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Protection | Standard scratch-resistant glass (official type not disclosed) | Schott Xensation glass |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2 × Cortex-A76 Performance Cores 6 × Cortex-A55 Efficiency Cores | Octa-core (4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| Operating system | Android 16 HiOS 16 | Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB LPDDR4X Supports Memory Fusion (Virtual RAM) up to 16GB (market dependent) Better | 8 GB + 8 GB Extended |
| Internal storage | 128GB / 256GB UFS 2.2 Better | 128 GB |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated microSD card slot) | Yes, microSD up to 1TB |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.8 PDAF AI Lens LED Flash HDR Panorama AI Photography FlashSnap Night Mode Portrait Mode Beauty Mode AI Scene Detection | 50 MP (wide, OIS) + 2 MP (depth) |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP Single LED Flash Beauty Mode AI Portrait HDR | 32 MP (wide) Better |
| Video recording | 1080p@30fps 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR, Dual-View Video |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 6500 mAh (some regional variants list 6150 mAh rated capacity) Better | Non-removable Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W Super Charging | 80W wired fast charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Dual Nano-SIM (Dual Standby) | Dual Nano-SIM, IP54 dust and splash resistant |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Side-mounted Fingerprint Scanner Accelerometer Ambient Light Sensor Proximity Sensor E-Compass Virtual Gyroscope | In-display fingerprint, accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200?
Vivo Y200 comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 13.4 points. It wins on performance, camera, display and value for money. Tecno Spark 50 5G can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo Y200 in Pakistan?
Tecno Spark 50 5G is listed at PKR 64,999 and Vivo Y200 at PKR 57,999. That makes Vivo Y200 cheaper by PKR 7,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which has the better camera, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200?
Vivo Y200 scores higher in our camera assessment. Both use comparable main sensors, so day to day results come down to processing.
Which phone has the better battery, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200?
Tecno Spark 50 5G leads on battery. Tecno Spark 50 5G carries a 6500 mAh cell and Vivo Y200 a 5000 mAh cell, with 45W and 80W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Tecno Spark 50 5G or Vivo Y200?
Vivo Y200 is the stronger gaming phone here. Tecno Spark 50 5G runs the MediaTek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) while Vivo Y200 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6 nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Vivo Y200 vs TECNO POVA 6 Free Fire Edition
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Spark 30 Pro
Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
Vivo Y200 vs Tecno Camon 30 5G
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.