Head to head

Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE nubia A57

Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 9 Jul 2026.

The short answer

The Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 82 against 48 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance, camera and battery & charging. The ZTE nubia A57 still wins on value for money, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The ZTE nubia A57 is the cheaper of the two at PKR 36,499 against PKR 339,999.

View raw data
Add another phone to this comparison

Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.

The verdict

Spec-derived

Vivo X300 Pro takes it by 34.2 points on our weighted spec score.

Performance Vivo X300 Pro leads

Gaming score where available, otherwise chipset tier plus usable RAM.

Camera Vivo X300 Pro leads

Camera Score where available, otherwise sensor resolution and lens count. Megapixels alone do not measure image quality.

Battery & charging Vivo X300 Pro leads

Cell capacity in mAh weighted with rated wired charging output.

Display Vivo X300 Pro leads

Pixel density, refresh rate and panel technology.

Memory & storage Vivo X300 Pro leads

Highest advertised RAM and internal storage configuration.

Value for money ZTE nubia A57 leads

Combined spec score divided by current Pakistani retail price.

What actually differs

  • ZTE nubia A57 costs PKR 303,500 less.
  • Vivo X300 Pro packs a 1,510 mAh larger battery.
  • Vivo X300 Pro charges 67.5W faster.
  • Vivo X300 Pro offers 12 GB more RAM.
  • Vivo X300 Pro ships with 896 GB more storage.
  • Vivo X300 Pro has a 187 MP higher-resolution main sensor.
  • Vivo X300 Pro uses an OLED panel while the other sticks with LCD.

Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if…

you care most about performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage.

Buy the ZTE nubia A57 if…

you care most about value for money.

Full specification comparison

Specification Vivo X300 Pro ZTE nubia A57
Price in Pakistan
Retail price PKR 339,999 PKR 36,499 Cheaper
Design & build
Release date Coming Soon (Expected Q4 2025 in Pakistan) July 30, 2026
Dimensions 161.2 × 75.5 × 8.0 mm 160.1 × 70.4 × 8.0 mm
Weight 226 g 193 g Better
Water resistance IP68 Rating Dust-tight protection Water resistant in fresh water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes IP69 Rating Protection against high-pressure and high-temperature water jets IP64 — dust-tight and protected against water splashes
Display
Screen size 6.78 inches Better 6.75-inch
Resolution 1260 × 2800 pixels (~453 ppi) Better 720 × 1570 pixels
Panel type 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ IPS LCD, 120Hz refresh rate
Protection Not listed Unspecified.
Performance
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) Unisoc T7250 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (Dimensity 9500 architecture) Octa-core
GPU Arm G1-Ultra Mali-G57 MP1
Operating system Android 16 with OriginOS 6 Android 16
Memory & storage
RAM 12 GB / 16 GB Better 4GB
Internal storage 256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB Better 64GB/128GB
Card slot No Dedicated microSDXC Slot
Camera
Main camera 50 MP (Sony LYT-828, OIS) + 200 MP Periscope Telephoto (OIS) + 50 MP Ultra-wide Better 13 MP, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Selfie camera 50 MP wide (AF) Better 8 MP, f/2.0
Video recording 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps 1080p@30fps (rear), 1080p@30fps (front)
Battery & charging
Battery capacity Non-removable Li-Ion ~6510 mAh (typical) Better Li-Ion (non-removable) 5000 mAh
Wired charging 90W fast charging, 40W wireless charging Better 22.5W wired fast charging
Connectivity & extras
SIM Dual Nano-SIM Dual Nano-SIM, Dual Standby
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 5.2, A2DP, LE
NFC Yes No
Sensors Ultrasonic under-display fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
USB USB Type-C 3.2, OTG USB Type-C OTG

“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Vivo X300 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?

Vivo X300 Pro comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 34.2 points. It wins on performance, camera, battery & charging, display and memory & storage. ZTE nubia A57 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.

What is the price of Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE nubia A57 in Pakistan?

Vivo X300 Pro is listed at PKR 339,999 and ZTE nubia A57 at PKR 36,499. That makes ZTE nubia A57 cheaper by PKR 303,500. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.

Which has the better camera, Vivo X300 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?

Vivo X300 Pro scores higher in our camera assessment. Vivo X300 Pro uses a 200 MP main sensor against 13 MP on ZTE nubia A57, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.

Which phone has the better battery, Vivo X300 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?

Vivo X300 Pro leads on battery. Vivo X300 Pro carries a 6510 mAh cell and ZTE nubia A57 a 5000 mAh cell, with 90W and 22W wired charging respectively.

Which is better for gaming, Vivo X300 Pro or ZTE nubia A57?

Vivo X300 Pro is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo X300 Pro runs the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3nm) while ZTE nubia A57 runs the Unisoc T7250 (12 nm).

Related comparisons

Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo X500 Ultra ZTE nubia A57 vs Vivo X500 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra ZTE nubia A57 vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra ZTE nubia A57 vs ZTE nubia NaviX Ultra Vivo X300 Pro vs Oppo Reno 16 ZTE nubia A57 vs Oppo Reno 16

Tools that use this data

Camera Score Tool Battery Score Tool Gaming Performance Checker AI Mobile Recommendation Tool All comparisons

Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.