Vivo X500 Ultra
Vivo
PKR 364,999
75/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Vivo X500 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 13 Sep 2026.
The short answer
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 75 on our combined specification score. It leads on performance and value for money. The Vivo X500 Ultra still wins on battery & charging, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the cheaper of the two at PKR 289,999 against PKR 364,999.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra
Poco
PKR 289,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewAdd another phone to this comparison
Up to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
The verdict
Spec-derivedXiaomi Poco F9 Ultra takes it by 16.2 points on our weighted spec score.
What actually differs
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra costs PKR 75,000 less.
- Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra packs a 550 mAh larger battery.
- Vivo X500 Ultra charges 20W faster.
Buy the Vivo X500 Ultra if…
you care most about battery & charging.
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra if…
you care most about performance and value for money.
Full specification comparison
| Specification | Vivo X500 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 364,999 | PKR 289,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | September 30, 2026 (Expected) | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 78.1 x 8.4 mm | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm |
| Weight | 235 g | 235 g |
| Water resistance | IP68/IP69 Dust/Water Resistant | IP68 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.89 Inches | 6.9-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 Pixels (~505 PPI) Better | 1200 × 2608 pixels |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED Capacitive Touchscreen, 1B Colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) 3000Hz Instant Touch Sampling Rate, 2160Hz PWM Dimming, 99% DCI-P3, 10-bit Color Depth | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 6 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 850 | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 |
| Operating system | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X |
| Internal storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | Triple Camera: 200 MP + 200 MP + 200 MP, LED Flash, Laser AF, ZEISS Optics, ZEISS T* Lens Coating, HDR, Panorama, 3D LUT Import | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 |
| Selfie camera | 100 MP, HDR, Panorama Better | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode |
| Video recording | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, Gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | Li-ion Si-Ca 7500 mAh, Non-removable | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 120W Fast Charging, 50W Wireless Charging Better | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM, Dual SIM (2 Active) | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Bluetooth | v6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Ultrasonic Under-Display Fingerprint Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Infrared Sensor | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Questions people ask
Which is better, Vivo X500 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 16.2 points. It wins on performance and value for money. Vivo X500 Ultra can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
What is the price of Vivo X500 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra in Pakistan?
Vivo X500 Ultra is listed at PKR 364,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra at PKR 289,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra cheaper by PKR 75,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Which phone has the better battery, Vivo X500 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Vivo X500 Ultra leads on battery. Vivo X500 Ultra carries a 7500 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra a 8050 mAh cell, with 120W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Which is better for gaming, Vivo X500 Ultra or Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra?
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger gaming phone here. Vivo X500 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 6 Pro while Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Keep looking
Related comparisons
Vivo X500 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11
Vivo X500 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Max
Vivo X500 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Oppo Reno 16
Vivo X500 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 70 Plus
You looked at these recently
Tools that use this data
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.