Samsung Galaxy S25
Samsung
PKR 314,999
86/100 overall
Full specs & reviewHead to head
Full specification and price comparison for Pakistan, updated 16 Aug 2026.
The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the stronger phone of the two, scoring 92 against 86 on our combined specification score. It leads on camera, battery & charging and memory & storage. The Samsung Galaxy S25 still wins on performance, so it remains the better choice if that is your priority. The Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra is the cheaper of the two at PKR 289,999 against PKR 314,999.
Samsung
PKR 314,999
86/100 overall
Full specs & reviewPoco
PKR 289,999
92/100 overall
Full specs & reviewUp to 4 devices can share one comparison table.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra takes it by 5.2 points on our weighted spec score.
you care most about performance.
you care most about camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Price in Pakistan | ||
| Retail price | PKR 314,999 | PKR 289,999 Cheaper |
| Design & build | ||
| Release date | Launched January 2025 (global) | September 2026 |
| Dimensions | 146.9 × 70.5 × 7.2 mm | 163.49 × 77.94 × 8.74 mm |
| Weight | 162 g Better | 235 g |
| Water resistance | IP68 dust and water resistance (up to 1.5 m for 30 min) | IP68 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2 inches | 6.9-inch Better |
| Resolution | 1080 × 2340 pixels (~416 ppi) | 1200 × 2608 pixels Better |
| Panel type | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120 Hz | AMOLED 185Hz refresh rate, 12-bit color, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, up to 10,000 nits peak brightness |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×4.47 GHz + 6×3.53 GHz) | Octa-core, up to 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno GPU, VisionBoost D8 |
| Operating system | Android 15 with One UI 7 | Android 16, HyperOS 3. |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12GB/16GB LPDDR5X Better |
| Internal storage | 512 GB (non-expandable) | 256GB/512GB/1TB UFS 4.1, Better |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | • 50 MP wide (OIS) + 10 MP telephoto (3× optical) + 12 MP ultra-wide | 200MP, f/1.68, OIS + 50MP periscope telephoto, f/3.0, OIS, 5x optical zoom + 50MP ultrawide, f/2.4 Better |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP wide | 32MP, f/2.2, HDR, Portrait Mode Better |
| Video recording | 8K @24/30 fps, 4K @30/60 fps, 1080p @30/60/240 fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30fps, Slow-motion up to 1920fps |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery capacity | 4000 mAh (non-removable) | Silicon-carbon battery (non-removable) 8050 mAh Better |
| Wired charging | 25W wired, 15W wireless (Qi2), 4.5W reverse wireless | 100W wired, 50W wireless, 27W reverse wired, 22.5W reverse wireless Charging Better |
| Connectivity & extras | ||
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (up to two eSIM active) | Dual Nano-SIM / eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Bluetooth | v5.4 | 6.0, Dual Bluetooth |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Under-display ultrasonic fingerprint, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, proximity | Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, IR Blaster, Flicker Sensor, X-Axis Linear Vibration Motor, Color Temperature Sensor |
| USB | USB-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
“Better” marks the higher (or, for price and weight, the lower) figure. It is a specification difference, not a judgement about real-world experience.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra comes out ahead on our combined spec score, leading by 5.2 points. It wins on camera, battery & charging, memory & storage and value for money. Samsung Galaxy S25 can still be the better buy if your priorities sit elsewhere or if you find it at a lower street price.
Samsung Galaxy S25 is listed at PKR 314,999 and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra at PKR 289,999. That makes Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra cheaper by PKR 25,000. Retail prices move often, so treat these as indicative.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra scores higher in our camera assessment. Samsung Galaxy S25 uses a 50 MP main sensor against 200 MP on Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra, though sensor size and processing matter more than resolution alone.
Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra leads on battery. Samsung Galaxy S25 carries a 4000 mAh cell and Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra a 8050 mAh cell, with 25W and 100W wired charging respectively.
Samsung Galaxy S25 is the stronger gaming phone here. Samsung Galaxy S25 runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) while Xiaomi Poco F9 Ultra runs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm).
Scores are calculated from the published hardware specification of each device using the same formula for every phone on WhatMobilePK — they are not paid placements and they are not laboratory test results. Prices are indicative Pakistani retail prices and change frequently.